nasdaq
10.06.2002, 19:35 |
Monney supply, Gold, supply side economists and Larry Kudlow Thread gesperrt |
Hallo,
nachfolgend möchte ich einen diskussionswürdigen Artikel von Larry Kudlow posten, der vielen hier bekannt sein dürfte. Mit seinen Aussagen lehnt er sich auch stark an das Allheilmittel des Monney Supply Wachstums an.
Auf jeden Fall gehört er trotz seiner mitunter fraglichen Aussagen mit diesem Artikel zu den Verfechtern eines höheren Goldpreises und geht nicht an allen Realitäten vorbei, wie es manche Zentralbanker wohl gerne hätten (Wachstum der Geldmenge = Ansteigen der Inflation und trotzdem fallender Goldpreis???)
Wenngleich ich seinen Ausführungen zur Geldmenge nicht immer folgen kann, so hat er doch als supply side economist in den USA für einiges an Umdenken von den demand sidern gesorgt, wenngleich ich beide Theorien für wichtig halte, ist doch gerade in Europa noch ein verstärktes Denken zu den"demand" sidern zu sehen, deren Ausgleich es durch die"supply" sider manchmal braucht um wieder zur"Mitte" zu finden...
Grüße
Andreas
Olympian Gold
Real money is up for very good reason.
While stock markets have struggled to regain their stride this year, glittering gold has become a runaway investment story. So far, gold funds are up nearly 60% in 2002, with the gold price moving up to $320. That's its highest mark since mid-1999. Gold is on fire.
Conventional mainstream economists always argue that rising gold prices reflect"special factors" in the world, such as war or other international tensions. So the consensus crowd attributes the current gold rally to the global war on terrorism, ongoing Middle East tensions, and even recent bomb scares in New York.
But there's much more to the gold spike than that."Gold and only gold is real money," said banker J.P. Morgan early in the last century. He was right then and he is still right today.
Over the last 5,000 years or so gold has held its value far better than various substitutes, such as paper currency. And through its long history gold has always communicated a monetary message of inflation (when money value declines) or deflation (when money value rises).
So right now, the clear message of this year's gold rally is that there's been a shift in Federal Reserve policy from deflation to a certain amount of reflation. Essentially, the gold spike points to a big Fed policy change: the basic money supply, or monetary base, controlled by the central bank has stopped shrinking and has resumed a more normal rate of increase. This is welcome news.
As the Fed deflated the cash base of the economy from a more than 15% growth rate at the end of 1999 to a 5% decline rate at the end of 2000, the gold price slumped from $310 to $255. But over the past sixteen months, the Fed has expanded the monetary base to a 10% growth rate. Hence, gold has turned up.
This means a good deal for the economy and the stock market. It means that businesses will gradually recover from a nasty deflationary credit crunch, and it signals an end to the business contraction. Already, industrial production and capital-goods orders are turning up. And with lower tax-rates on small and large businesses in place, this recovery process will receive the nurturing it needs.
However, looking at the long history of gold, some would say the upturn is a signal that inflation is on the way. But this is doubtful. The gold value of the U.S. dollar has dropped about 25% over the past year, and yes — that's normally an inflationary signal. But the domestic value of the dollar was vastly overvalued prior to this year, largely because the Fed disastrously drained far too much high-powered cash from the financial system. This money crunch created a massive worldwide commodity sell-off that ultimately led to protectionist trade agreements over so-called anti-dumping charges. But the true problem was not commodity dumping, it was bad central banking. Dollars were way too scarce. Fortunately, the Fed has changed its tune.
A mild whiff of reflation is a good thing. Not only is the Fed supplying more dollars to the U.S. economy, it is also replenishing liquidity to the world economy. Without exaggerating, somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of the global economy relies on U.S. dollars to grease the wheels of international commerce and trade. So the dollar's back in action where it should be.
In purely statistical terms, the government-reported inflation rate could rise by roughly one percentage point over the next year or so, but in market-price-rule terms it's really just a shift from deflation to price stability. Long-term Treasury rates have already discounted most of this, and short-term rates will gradually reflect this over the next twelve to eighteen months. This really looks like nothing more than interest-rate normalcy in a rising economy.
In the Olympics, athletes go for the gold. In our recovering economy, the gold story is simply too good for investors not to get back in the games.
<center>
<HR>
</center> |
Valueinvestor
10.06.2002, 20:05
@ nasdaq
|
Larry Kudlow? |
Ich kenne diesen Kudlow als Chief economist von CNBC. Ein ganz schmieriger Typ, der für"corporate America" die Werbetrommel rührt. Meines Erachtens ist der eher eine Art US-Bubble-Chefideologe und bestimmt kein ernstzunehmender Volkswirt. Nasdaq 5000 war für ihn kein Problem, sondern das Ergebnis des amerikanischen Produktivitätswunders. Es gibt keine Manipulation, keinen Skandal, wo er nicht irgend etwas Positives sieht. Erst neulich meinte er allen Ernstes, dass amerikanische Aktien wegen Enron eine Höherbewertung erfahren sollten, da man ja nun"ehrlicher" bilanzieren werde. Aber wahrscheinlich hat er damit sogar recht, da dann das"G" im KGV wesentlich kleiner ausfallen würde (nur hat er das garantiert nicht so gemeint).
<center>
<HR>
</center> |
JüKü
10.06.2002, 20:27
@ nasdaq
|
Re: Monney supply, Gold, supply side economists and Larry Kudlow |
>Essentially, the gold spike points to a big Fed policy change: the basic money supply, or monetary base, controlled by the central bank has stopped shrinking and has resumed a more normal rate of increase. This is welcome news.
>But over the past sixteen months, the Fed has expanded the monetary base to a 10% growth rate.
10 % nennt der Spinner"a more normal rate"????
>This means a good deal for the economy and the stock market. It means that businesses will gradually recover from a nasty deflationary credit crunch
Ja, ja... papperlapapp.
>But the true problem was not commodity dumping, it was bad central banking. Dollars were way too scarce. Fortunately, the Fed has changed its tune.
Too scarce? Und die explodierten Schulden haben nichts mit Geld zu tun? Null Durchblick.
>A mild whiff of reflation is a good thing.
Klar, bis die Kaufkraft bei Null ist.
>Not only is the Fed supplying more dollars to the U.S. economy, it is also replenishing liquidity to the world economy.
Mainstream-Quatsch.
<center>
<HR>
</center> |
silvereagle
10.06.2002, 21:22
@ JüKü
|
@JüKü: Die kriegen das nicht mehr aus ihren Köpfen raus... |
>Not only is the Fed supplying more dollars to the U.S. economy, it is also replenishing liquidity to the world economy.
"Geld belebt die Welt.""Ach Alan, wirf doch mal die Papiermaschine an, der Wohlstand geht uns aus!"
Was für ein Glück, dass es so einfach nicht ist. Der Horror ist ein enden-wollender... ;-)
Gruß, silvereagle
<center>
<HR>
</center> |