Amanito
23.09.2005, 17:04 |
Kennedy Gammage: The Hindenburg Omen - A Potential Stock Market Crash Signal Thread gesperrt |
-->No indicator can predict with 100 percent certainty when the stock market is going to crash, but here is one indicator that identifies the possibility.
The Hindenburg Omen was adopted by Jim Miekka, editor and publisher of The Sudbury Bull and Bear Report (6735 14th Street, St. Petersburg, FL, (813) 866 - 8682), derived from a New High - New Low indicator developed by Gerald Appel many years ago. It worked for a time, but Jim then made certain changes in its makeup and calculation which gave it greater reliability. Because it signals the possibility of a stock market crash, I suggested that Jim name it after that famous ill-fated aircraft associated with the word “crash.”
Jim warned us that a Hindenburg Omen is only occurring when the 10-week moving average of the NYSE Composite Index, based upon a weekly Friday close, is in a rising trend. If the NYSE Composite 10-week moving average Friday close is down, the signal is invalid. Second, if the McClellan Oscillator is in a positive configuration (i.e., with a + reading, above zero), you will be best served to postpone any selling until the McClellan Oscillator turns negative. However, when a Hindenburg Omen signal occurs with the McClellan Oscillator in negative territory, “Stand not upon the order of thy going…” - Sell at once!
Hindenburg Omens are relatively rare. In checking them from 1997, going back to 1970, Jim found that they usually occurred prior to major declines, with relatively few false signals. Sometimes two or three signals occurred in a row, within days of each other. I consider that a signal expires 30 days after its last occurrence, unless a decline has taken place within that time. There was only one signal before the 7% drop in October of 1989, but there were several days of signals in both 1987, and again in June-July before the 20% drop into October, 1990. There were several before the 10% drop in March 1994.
So what are the New High - New Low numbers necessary for a Hindenburg Omen? We get a CAUTION if, on any given day, BOTH New Highs AND New Lows number more than 79. At this development, we must check for a signal as follows:
First, find the daily number of New Highs, and the daily number of New Lows, on the NYSE. Then take the lower of those two numbers.
Next, divide the lower of those two daily NYSE New High - New Low numbers by the total number of issued traded that day on the NYSE (these days that number will probably be somewhere between 3,300 and 3,500 total NYSE issues, or thereabouts. Over the years, the number will vary).
Third, multiply the resultant number by 100. If the result is LARGER than 2.2, you have a potential Hindenburg Omen.
Fourth, check that the NYSE 10 week moving average is rising. If it is then,
Fifth, check that the McClellan Oscillator is negative.
If it is, then we have a Hindenburg Omen, a high risk stock market crash signal.
SELL.
EXAMPLE: On Thursday September 1, 2005, NYSE New Highs totaled 282, while New Lows for that day were only 26. Taking the lower of those two numbers, 26, and dividing it by the number of issues traded that day, 3,420, we get.0076. Multiplying that by 100, we get 0.76 - far less than the 2.2 necessary to render a Hindenburg Omen SELL signal.
However, suppose that instead of 26 New Lows, we had 79 New Lows. Well, dividing 79 New Lows by the number of NYSE issues traded that day, 3,420, we get 0.0230994. Multiplied by 100, that equals 2.30994, MORE than 2.2, so that hypothetical lower number of New Highs versus New Lows would have warned of a potential signal.
If the 10 week NYSE moving average is also rising, and the McClellan Oscillator is also negative, then a Hindenburg Omen SELL signal has been generated.
One final note: Do not rely on YAHOO! Or other electronic New High - New Low figures, which are frequently off. Use the later newspaper figures to be accurate - and double-check those, as well!
Best of luck!
Kennedy Gammage
<ul> ~ http://www.aexcyclus.nl/hindenburgomen.html</ul>
|
Amanito
23.09.2005, 17:08
@ Amanito
|
am 20.9.05 generiert |
-->20-09-05: A Hindenburg Omen stock market crash signal was generated tonight, according to the official statistics per the Wall Street Journal as reported by Kennedy Gammage. According to Kennedy, there were 78 New Lows and 167 New 52 week highs on the NYSE Tuesday, with total issues traded at 3,442. This works out to a common new lows/new highs figure of 78, which when divided by 3,442 gets us above the 2.2 percent threshold, at 2.26 percent. The other two conditions necessary for an official Hindenburg Omen stock market crash signal tonight are evident. The 10 week moving average of the NYSE is rising, and the McClellan Oscillator is negative.
What this means is that there is a high probability that a stock market crash is coming in the next 30 days, and likely sooner rather than later. This is not a guarantee of one, but signals that the risk of one occurring is quite high. The PPT will likely jump into action here and we will be able to observe two heavyweights trying their best to drive the market their way. The PPT won back in April 2004, the last time we got such a signal. That has not always been the case, and may not be so this time. Please be alert with your long positions. The signals remain valid for 30 days. More confirming Hindenburg Omens are possible, and normal.
This confirms the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment stock market crash signal we got on Friday. Again, these are crash risk signals, not a guarantee. The Omen and Michigan signals mean we have gone from orange alert to red. Purple would be the meltdown is underway, to apply the color scheme the government's NOAA uses to classify geomagnetic solar storms for our purposes.
As for the Fed, they did what we expected them to do, increasing short-term rates another quarter in order to trump up confidence that the economy is stronger than it is, hoping to seduce markets to believe same. But in contradiction to the pretense of tightening, the Fed's actions will continue to be to flood markets with money -- because they are truly quite fragile.
<ul> ~ http://www.aexcyclus.nl/publiek.html</ul>
|
Maurer
24.09.2005, 12:07
@ Amanito
|
Wiesen die Insider-Positionierungen nicht eben noch auf Hausse!? (owT) |
-->>No indicator can predict with 100 percent certainty when the stock market is going to crash, but here is one indicator that identifies the possibility.
>
>The Hindenburg Omen was adopted by Jim Miekka, editor and publisher of The Sudbury Bull and Bear Report (6735 14th Street, St. Petersburg, FL, (813) 866 - 8682), derived from a New High - New Low indicator developed by Gerald Appel many years ago. It worked for a time, but Jim then made certain changes in its makeup and calculation which gave it greater reliability. Because it signals the possibility of a stock market crash, I suggested that Jim name it after that famous ill-fated aircraft associated with the word “crash.”
>
>Jim warned us that a Hindenburg Omen is only occurring when the 10-week moving average of the NYSE Composite Index, based upon a weekly Friday close, is in a rising trend. If the NYSE Composite 10-week moving average Friday close is down, the signal is invalid. Second, if the McClellan Oscillator is in a positive configuration (i.e., with a + reading, above zero), you will be best served to postpone any selling until the McClellan Oscillator turns negative. However, when a Hindenburg Omen signal occurs with the McClellan Oscillator in negative territory, “Stand not upon the order of thy going…” - Sell at once!
>
>Hindenburg Omens are relatively rare. In checking them from 1997, going back to 1970, Jim found that they usually occurred prior to major declines, with relatively few false signals. Sometimes two or three signals occurred in a row, within days of each other. I consider that a signal expires 30 days after its last occurrence, unless a decline has taken place within that time. There was only one signal before the 7% drop in October of 1989, but there were several days of signals in both 1987, and again in June-July before the 20% drop into October, 1990. There were several before the 10% drop in March 1994.
>
>So what are the New High - New Low numbers necessary for a Hindenburg Omen? We get a CAUTION if, on any given day, BOTH New Highs AND New Lows number more than 79. At this development, we must check for a signal as follows: >
>First, find the daily number of New Highs, and the daily number of New Lows, on the NYSE. Then take the lower of those two numbers.
>
>Next, divide the lower of those two daily NYSE New High - New Low numbers by the total number of issued traded that day on the NYSE (these days that number will probably be somewhere between 3,300 and 3,500 total NYSE issues, or thereabouts. Over the years, the number will vary).
>
>Third, multiply the resultant number by 100. If the result is LARGER than 2.2, you have a potential Hindenburg Omen.
>
>Fourth, check that the NYSE 10 week moving average is rising. If it is then,
>
>Fifth, check that the McClellan Oscillator is negative.
>
>If it is, then we have a Hindenburg Omen, a high risk stock market crash signal.
>
>SELL. >
>EXAMPLE: On Thursday September 1, 2005, NYSE New Highs totaled 282, while New Lows for that day were only 26. Taking the lower of those two numbers, 26, and dividing it by the number of issues traded that day, 3,420, we get.0076. Multiplying that by 100, we get 0.76 - far less than the 2.2 necessary to render a Hindenburg Omen SELL signal.
>
>However, suppose that instead of 26 New Lows, we had 79 New Lows. Well, dividing 79 New Lows by the number of NYSE issues traded that day, 3,420, we get 0.0230994. Multiplied by 100, that equals 2.30994, MORE than 2.2, so that hypothetical lower number of New Highs versus New Lows would have warned of a potential signal.
>If the 10 week NYSE moving average is also rising, and the McClellan Oscillator is also negative, then a Hindenburg Omen SELL signal has been generated.
>
>One final note: Do not rely on YAHOO! Or other electronic New High - New Low figures, which are frequently off. Use the later newspaper figures to be accurate - and double-check those, as well! >
>Best of luck!
>
>Kennedy Gammage
|
Ecki1
26.09.2005, 18:35
@ Maurer
|
Kostolany: An der Börse ist eben alles möglich, auch das Gegenteil ;-))) (o.Text) |
-->
|