-->da hat noch jemand den Debitismus verstanden...

“[...] There's a difference in Bernanke SAYING that the Fed will do anything to stem deflation, and actually having the Fed be successful in doing it. First, the Fed has NEVER in its history simply printed dollars. That's not what they do; they facilitate credit, which is different. Second, IF they were to simply print dollars, it would satisfy the ledger side of the equation, but do NOTHING to stem the real problem, which is too much debt ($30 TRILLION the last we counted). If the Fed is dumb enough to do this, then there is one and really only one investment that you would want to own---gold. Forget stocks. And forget bonds. Place yourself in the position of someone who is holding this debt. What would you do if you suddenly see that the U.S. government is purposely trashing their own balance sheet?? Dump your debt, which would drive the price down and interest rates up. In the end, financial paper would be worthless, no matter which route you go down. It's a bear market, and it's not over..... -SH”
(S. Hochberg, Feb 2003)

-->Hochberg schreibt:

In the end, financial paper would be worthless, no matter which route you go down. It's a bear market, and it's not over..... -SH”

Papierdollar sind auch financial paper und eine Schuld (Schuldschein). Warum sollte ausgerechnet dieses financial paper (diese Schuld) nicht worthless werden?

Gruß
R

-->Dass beides aus Papier besteht, ist völlig wurscht.

Bei Schuldschein auf Papier ist der wertlos, wenn die Schuld in default ist. Mit Schuldscheinen kann niemand Steuern zahlen.

Das GZ auf Papier ist wertlos, wenn es nicht mehr bei den Staatskassen angenommen, also nicht mehr GZ ist. Mit GZ muss jeder Steuern zahlen.

Gruß!