-->http://www.jungewelt.de/2003/11-17/002.php

17.11.2003

Kommentar
Werner Pirker

Sündenböcke

Israel macht Europäer mitverantwortlich

Obwohl die Urheberschaft des verheerenden Bombenanschlages in Istanbul noch weitgehend ungeklärt ist, meint man in Israel, zumindest die Mitschuldigen zu kennen. Es sind die Europäer, deren kritische Haltung gegenüber Israel die Gewalt gegen Juden befördere. Israels Außenminister Silwan Schalom verstieg sich zu der Behauptung, daß die in Europa geäußerte Kritik an Israel »verbalen Terror« ermutige, der zu physischem Terror führe.

Anschläge auf Synagogen sind ohne jeden Zweifel antijüdischen Charakters. Sie richten sich gegen die Juden als Religionsgemeinschaft [ Herr Pirker sollte mal den nächsten Artikel lesen. Vielleicht überlegt er dann mal, bevor er so selbstgewiss schreibt"ohne jeden Zweifel". Er sollte mal den Unterschied zwischen"wahrscheinlich" und"ohne jeden Zweifel" lernen! ]. Wie auch immer sie motiviert sein mögen: Sie stehen in keinem Zusammenhang mit dem legitimen Kampf der Palästinenser gegen die israelische Okkupation. Gleichzeitig sind sie nur aus dem nahöstlichen Kontext erklärbar - bezogen auf die Rolle Israels, die es im arabisch-islamischen Raum spielt. Der europäische Antisemitismus hat eine völlig andere Genesis.

Was die israelische Führung von den europäischen Staaten einfordert, ist eine völlig unkritische Übernahme der israelischen Position, die in der Darstellung der Politik der nationalen Unterdrückung des palästinensischen Volkes als permanente »Anti-Terror-Kampagne« besteht. Diese Sichtweise wird vom europäischen Mainstream ohnedies weitgehend geteilt. In Israel aber herrscht die Meinung vor, daß nicht nur Kritik am Zionismus, nicht nur Kritik an der israelischen Politik, sondern auch Kritik an einzelnen Maßnahmen Israels wie dem Bau des »Sicherheitswalls« einer im Prinzip »israelfeindlichen« und damit antisemitischen Haltung entspricht. Das ist eine verheerende, die jüdische Existenz bedrohende Position. Das Wesen der zionistischen Legitimationsideologie besteht in der totalen Identifizierung von Israel und Judentum. Der gleichen Logik folgt der Terror gegen jüdische Religionseinrichtungen.

Der aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach von Islamisten ausgeführte Terroranschlag bedurfte keiner europäischen Ermutigung. Das Ergebnis einer Umfrage in den EU-Ländern, derzufolge 58 Prozent der Befragten Israel eine friedensgefährdende Rolle bescheinigten, dürfte die Attentäter wohl kaum beflügelt haben.

Israel als zionistisches Projekt hatte im europäischen Antisemitismus seine wichtigste Antriebskraft. Doch ist Israel keineswegs die staatliche Negation des Antisemitismus. Es ist vielmehr ein auf einem weißen Siedlerkolonialismus begründeter Staat und deshalb Gegenstand antiimperialistischer Kritik. Es ist aber auch eine Projektionsfläche für Antisemiten. Daß die Scharon-Politik den Antisemitismus befördert, hat nicht nur ein Möllemann behauptet. Das hat unlängst auch der Börsenspekulant und Großfinanzier der internationalen Zivilgesellschaft, George Soros, des Antisemitismus sicher unverdächtig, so gesagt.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


http://rense.com/general44/tsthem.htm

Turkey Synagogue Bombing - 'It's The Mossad Stupid'
Commentary By Margalit Cohen
Sydney, Australia
11-16-3

Jeff,

Just like with the bombings of Iraqis and other Arabs...which are blamed on 'al Qaeda'...this one smells of the Mossad. Please read an almost IDENTICAL Mossad operation (very well documented) on our Iraqi Jews: http://www.rense.com/general34/cart.htm

As hard for it is for decent people of any religion to believe, Zionists have sacrificed Jews for their own devices many times...it is a fact.

The bombings in Iraq against Iraqis and especially the most recent blasts in Saudi Arabia killing Arabs are both Mossad templates. For the most part, Arabs don't kill Arabs in bomb blasts if it can be avoided.

In Iraq, killing civilians in 'suicide bombings' can serve to turn Iraqis against the 'resistance' and toward the US occupation forces...at least that would be the logic for a Mossad operation.

In Saudi Arabia, the bombings were immediately labeled as the work of 'Al Qaeda'... a transparent joke.

And now Turkey. Remember ALWAYS to ask yourself immediately: geopolitically WHO BENEFITS THE MOST?

The majority of phone calls and reports of organizations taking 'credit' for bombings are probably bogus and not made by the people actually responsible. It's all too easy to manipulate.

I just watched the BBC report from the synagogue bombing in Turkey...blood everywhere.

I listened VERY CAREFULLY to this initial report...so as to soak up every detail before the spins began.

1. Some 'official' said that they had received ONE telephone from a Moslem organization taking credit for the bombs.

2. The reporter was VERY CAREFUL to emphasise that this organization has been quiet for a long time, apparenty inactive, and that everybody in Turkey was more than surprised to hear that this organization would allegedly be involved in such a major bombing.

3. The reporter, to my surprise, was also very careful to emphasize that this Moslem organization has NEVER attacked Jews, and had always concentrated only on objecting to secular Turkish institutions.

4. CNN few minutes ago, 'reluctantly' announced that the Turkish government does not believe that this crime was done by ANY local Turkish organization, but it is the work of an international organization. CNN, 'as usual', immediately contributed their own opinion: that the bombing was done by 'al Qaeda'. It has become very clear that CNN and Fox have turned into mouthpieces for the Zionist Israeli government.

5. I would hope that the public will finally realize that there is scant evidence that al Qaeda exists today. Most of al Qaeda was vaporized in their caves in the Afghan mountains. This allows the CIA, Zionist, and Pentagon to conduct their manipulative wave of terrorism undisturbed, and no one will ever blame them. Please pay attention that ALL references and innuendos in the 'news' are just assumptions coming from 'experts' or 'authorities' provided to CNN and Fox by 'confidential unidentified military sources'.

MY CONCLUSION

The 'telephone call' claiming credit for the bombing means NOTHING, zero.

Traditionally, many people make calls after bombings to put the blame on someone else.

IMHO, this was likely a Zionist Israeli job with the trained media putting the blame on an 'Islamic' organization which the current Turkish government hates.

Talking about crocodile tears, Israel just announced, as I am writing this, that they will be glad to help Turkey to 'fight terrorism and find the terrorists...'

sure...


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Tja, und mittlerweile"ermittelt" also der MOSSAD in Istanbul:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/11/16/1068917671424.html



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Ziemlich lange nach den Explosionen war gestern noch nichts von angeblichen Autobomben zu lesen! Stattdessen von einem KRATER. Was übrigens eher für einen geheimdienstlich im Boden plazierten Sprengsatz spricht als für einen Selbstmörder, der mit Sprengstoff im Auto vorfährt!!!


http://de.news.yahoo.com/031115/12/3r6a7.html

Samstag 15. November 2003, 09:45 Uhr
Elf Tote bei Explosionen nahe Istanbuler Synagogen

Istanbul (AP) Bei schweren Explosionen nahe zwei Synagogen in Istanbul sind am Samstag laut Fernsehberichten elf Menschen getötet und mindestens 30 verletzt worden. Eine der beiden Detonationen ereignete sich in der Nähe der größten Istanbuler Synagoge Neve Shalom, die zweite beschädigte die Beth-Israel-Synagoge. Vor dem Gebäude war auf Fernsehbildern ein eineinhalb Meter weiter Krater zu sehen, Sanitäter trugen Menschen mit zum Teil schweren Verbrennungen davon. Ob es sich um einen Anschlag handelte, war zunächst unklar.

Der Sender CNN-Turk berichtete, die Polizei habe Ermittlungen in diese Richtung aufgenommen. Dagegen hieß es im Sender NTV, die Explosionen seien durch ein Leck in einer Gasleitung ausgelöst worden. Die Neve-Shalom-Synagoge war 1986 Ziel eines Angriffs gewesen, bei dem bewaffnete mutmaßliche Palästinenser während eines Gottesdiensts 22 Gläubige töteten und sechs weitere verletzten.


Oder auch:

http://de.news.yahoo.com/031115/3/3r6aq.html

Samstag 15. November 2003, 10:14 Uhr
Medien: Elf Tote bei Explosion vor einer Synagoge in Istanbul

Istanbul (dpa) - Bei einer schweren Explosion vor einer Synagoge in Istanbul sind am Samstag nach ersten Berichten mindestens elf Menschen getötet und Dutzende verletzt worden. Zunächst herrschte Unklarheit, ob es sich um einen Bombenanschlag oder um eine Gasexplosion handelte. Vor der Synagoge klaffte nach der Detonation, die die Straße in ein Trümmerfeld verwandelte, ein großes Loch.
(...)


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


http://www.libertyforum.org/showthreaded.php?Board=news_politics&Number=1034680

Category: News & Opinion Topic: Politics & Elections
Synopsis:
Source: Real News
Published: November 16, 2003 Author: Ken Francis
For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.

Real News 24/7

FEATURED STORY
September 27, 2003

Wesley Clark is fourth Democratic candidate touting his Jewish connections

by Ken Francis

Part I: Descended from the priestly caste of Kohen Part II: Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the most kosher of them all? Part III: The Clinton Factor Part IV: Calling General Backtrack! Parts V and VI: coming soon


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"That's the big thing this season, Jewish ancestry."

—Wesley Clark on
running for president

You don't need to be Jewish to be running as a Democrat for president, but it doesn't hurt! No fewer than four candidates have Jewish ties and in some cases, at least, the controlled news media have made much of the fact.

When Joe Lieberman ran as Al Gore's running mate in the 2000 election, his standing as an Orthodox Jew was widely reported, as was his place in history as the first openly Jewish candidate on major party ticket. (Who is Joe Lieberman?) This time around he's seeking the White House.

John Kerry, who regularly had been referred to in articles as being Irish-Catholic, shocked the political world last February, when he announced that his immigrant grandfather was an Czech Jew named Kohn, who later changed his name to Kerry. And Kerry added that his paternal grandmother was also of Jewish descent. ('Irish-American' Kerry's Jewish roots revealed)

When candidate Howard Dean's wife has been mentioned, it's usually as Mrs. Judy Dean, but at her office, she's known as Dr. Judith Steinberg. Although Dean is an ex-Catholic who now identifies his faith as Congregationalist, his spouse is considered a"devout Jew" and their children are being raised as Jews. (The Unlikely Rise of Howard Dean)

The latest candidate with a Jewish connection to throw his hat into the ring is retired General Wesley K. Clark (photo, right). According to some Jewish news sources, the telegenic former NATO commander during the Bosnian War (who some have accused of war crimes) and a player in the deadly assault of the Branch Davidians in Waco proudly boasts of coming from sturdy rabbinical stock.


Part I: Descended from the priestly caste of Kohen

In an article on Baltimore's Jewish Times website, reporter Ron Kampeas began with what for many readers may be something of a surprise:

Raised a Southern Baptist who later converted to Roman Catholicism, Gen. Wesley Clark knew just what to say when he strode into a Brooklyn yeshiva in 1999, ostensibly to discuss his leadership of NATO's victory in Yugoslavia.

"I feel a tremendous amount in common with you," the uniformed four-star general told the stunned roomful of students."I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son -- at least five generations, and they were all rabbis." (Wesley Clark's Jewish roots This past March, Clark conceded that he might be wrong about the line of"rabbis" among his Jewish ancestors, but apparently Kampeas doesn't know this or doesn't want to leave out a spicy detail. See Wesley Clark still on maneuvers for clarification.)

Later, Clark elaborated on his background when interviewed by a Jewish publication:

He told The Jewish Week in New York, which first reported the yeshiva comment in 1999, that his ancestors were not just Jews, but members of the priestly caste of Kohens.

Clark's Jewish father, Benjamin Kanne, died when he was 4, but he has kept in touch with his father's family since his 20s, when he rediscovered his Jewish roots. He is close to a first cousin, Barry Kanne, who heads a pager company in Georgia.

"Apparently Clark, 58, revels in his Jewish roots," writes Kampeas, who notes that he is a staunch supporter of Israel, who also"favors many of the liberal views popular with many Jews. He is pro-choice, and is strongly in favor of separating church from state." (In other words, he supports a social policy that is, in practical terms, atheistic.)

Concerning Clark's ancestery, Lowell Ponte, writing for Front Page magazine, adds:

Wesley’s grandfather’s name had been Jacob Nemerovsky when he fled from Russian pogroms in the 1890s to Switzerland, where he obtained a false passport with the family name Kanne with which he immigrated to the United States.

General Wesley Clark speaks fluent Russian and could become the first American President to do so. Why he has not boasted of this in campaigning for Leftist Democratic support is a mystery. (Wesley Clark: General Issues Ponte notes that Clark's middle initial stands for Kanne, a detail left unmentioned in the"Meet the General" section of www.clark04.com, the official website of the Clark campaign. The biography there is so sketchy as to make no mention whatsoever of his birth or upbringing.)

But there are other connections, too, however. Kampeas writes that

Two of Clark's top advisers are Jews who had prominent roles in the Clinton and Gore campaigns. Eli Segal was a top adviser to President Clinton in his first term; Ron Klain helped run Vice President Al Gore's 2000 campaign.

Having Jewish advisers, then, is definitely keeping with the times, but it is not nearly as trendy for the Democrats as being a Jew or at least having one in your family."That's the big thing this season, Jewish ancestry," Clark said back in March, when he was still in the ranks of the undeclared. Commenting on this remark, the Washington Post asked:

Why would Clark mention his Jewish heritage in the context of it being"the big thing this season" if he weren't placing himself in the context of the presidential field? And why would anyone care about Clark's ancestry if he were not a candidate for president, or vice president, or perhaps a Cabinet post? (Wesley Clark still on maneuvers These questions call to mind other ones that need to be covered in depth, such as: Why and how did being Jewish all of a sudden become the"in" thing for Democratic candidates? As opposed, say, to Catholic or Seventh Day Adventist?)

Now that these questions have been answered with Clark's throwing his hat (or"yarmulke," to use the Post's quip) into the ring, the question becomes not:"Is he Jewish?" but"Is he Jewish enough?"

Part II: Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who's the most kosher of them all?