Tut mir selbst am meisten leid.
Versteige mich zu der Vermutung, daß man mit höchster Priorität einen Run in Rohstoffe verhindern will.
Kein fiat money fĂĽr Rohstoffe.
Dabei steht das vieldiskutierte Silber an vorderster Front (dazu Appetizier fĂĽr Gold).
WeiĂź jedes Kind, schon durch den Altbestseller"Global 2000".
Man verbraucht möglichst nur soviel von jedem Rohstoff, daß der CRB wenig bewegt wird. So wird man versuchen, alle knappen Rohstoffe in Zukunft zu managen.
Das Managment: Zusammenwirken? von Notenbanken, Banken, Aktienfirmen usw.
1. In Rohstoffe strömendes fiat money wäre der Kollaps des"freien" Marktes.
2. Knappe Rohstoffe lassen sich nicht durch Geld vermehren. Ein Wettbewerb darum mit Geld ist zwar systemkonform, erhöht aber nur den CRB. Man treibt keinen Preis hoch, ohne zu profitieren.
Beispiel SILBER:
Spare mir das aufzählen, mir bekannter, sinnvoller Neuanwendungen, besonders bei derzeitigen Preisen.
Es gibt nur eine Erklärung dafür, daß man von allem die Finger läßt. Es sind keine ausreichenden Silbermengen beschaffbar.
Eine Preisvervielfachung würde das Silberangebot nicht erhöhen. Silber fällt bekanntlich unabhängig vom Preis, aber zwangsläufig, fast nur als Nebenprodukt an. Keine Kupfer-, Blei- oder Zinkmine erhöht die Produktion wegen des Nebenproduktes Silber.
Fiktiv:
Was nĂĽtzt die tollste Silberwunderbatterie, wenn sie wg. hohem Ag-Anteil niemand bezahlen kann?
Der hohe Preis käme zustande, weil mit einem Kampfpreisen, anderen Verbrauchern das Silber vorenthalten würde.
Aus Einsicht, mit Mehrkosten nicht mehr Material/Provit zu erhalten, verzichtet man gleich auf höheren Verbrauch. (Lieber Filme verkaufen, als auf unbezahlbaren Batterien zu sitzen).
Sogar ein weiterer Preisverfall wäre denkbar. Den sehen wir sogar.
Warum?
Wie gesagt: Die Nebenproduktion bei Zink, Blei und Kupfer läuft preisunabhängig weiter.
Nun komme niemand mit Charts und Zyklen.
Buffet, Soros, sogar Gates haben sich einen (kleinen) Silberteil gesichert und belassen es dabei.
Kapitalkräftige,"unabhängige", Insider würden sich einen Dreck um Zyklen und Charts kümmern. Die würden kaufen. Sie wissen warum sie nicht auf Teufel komm raus kaufen
Der Preis bewegt sich wenig.
Es wird und kann einfach nicht mehr Silber verbraucht werden. Es ist nicht da.
Wo möglich, werden Ersatzstoffe eingesetzt.
Oder kann sich jemand den Internetboom vorstellen, wenn für jeden PC 1kg Silber nötig wäre?
Dieser Boom wäre nicht finanzierbar gewesen und in Realität einfach am Silbermangelgescheitert.
So, soll mal genug Frust abgelassen sein.
m
<center>
<HR>
</center> |
Es gibt Sachen die unersätzlich sind, die Schaffung von Alternativen
kostet ebenso Haufen Geld.
Ist denn Erdöl nicht knapp? Im Moment nicht - der reicht ja schon für paar Jährchen. Aber: warum haben wir in Anbetracht dieser Tatsache kein Wasserstoffauto?
Du schreibst:"man will verhindern, daĂź das Geld in Rohstoffe geht, wenn dann doch lieber in Aktien". Super kaufe bitte die Aqua Aktie - und stelle Dir vor
was da laufen wird, wenn Silber nach oben steigt, und es wird steigen, weil derzeit Silber nicht zuersetzen ist. Und noch etwas: Silber wird weiterhin verwendet, solange es eben nicht auf 50 Dollar oder gar mehr steigt. Weil es
ein nebensächliches Produkt ist, man braucht kleine Mengen davon.
Zu dem Argument: Silber wird in der Fotografie verdrängt. Ha ha ha.
WeiĂźt Du eigentlich wie hoch die Kosten fĂĽr eine Umstellung sind?
Sie sind gewaltig und mit einem Farbfotodrucker fährst Du auch nicht sauber.
Erstens, er beherrscht die Auflösung nicht, zweitens ist in der Anschaffung
sau teuer. Das Fotopapier kostet auch Haufen Geld, und obendrein, die meisten
Menschen auf dieser Welt werden es sich nicht zumuten Digitalkamera fĂĽr
1000 DM, einen Fotodrucker fĂĽr ebensoviel, und dann auch noch die Arbeit,
Tinte und Fotopapier. Da kommst Du selbst bei 1000 Fotos nicht mehr
auf Deine Kosten.
Erst wenn der Film nicht mehr 8 DM kostet, sondern 16 kann man ernsthaft erwegen
auf digital umzurĂĽsten. Und das auch noch in Fragezeichen, weil die meisten
Tinten bereits nach 2 Jahren ihr Farbeigenschaft verlieren.
Und was ist mit den ganzen Chips, die eben Silber brauchen, ansonsten wäre
es kaum möglich was weiß ich soliden und stabilen Strom zu liefern?
Oder Veredelungsprozesse?
Und weiĂźt Du auch, daĂź Silber und Gold deswegen als Edelmetalle bezeichnet
werden, weil sie nicht korrodieren, weil Oxidation, wie bei Eisen, etc
einfach nicht eintrifft?
Das alles weiß die verehrte Industrie zu schätzen. Manche Rohstoffe,
die eigentlich als Spurelemente eines Bausatzes gelten, sind fĂĽr die
Industrie nicht zu ersetzen, jedenfalls nicht kostengĂĽnstiger, selbst wenn sich
Silber auf 30 - 50 Dollar biemen sollte.
>Tut mir selbst am meisten leid.
>Versteige mich zu der Vermutung, daß man mit höchster Priorität einen Run in Rohstoffe verhindern will.
>Kein fiat money fĂĽr Rohstoffe.
>Dabei steht das vieldiskutierte Silber an vorderster Front (dazu Appetizier fĂĽr Gold).
>WeiĂź jedes Kind, schon durch den Altbestseller"Global 2000".
>Man verbraucht möglichst nur soviel von jedem Rohstoff, daß der CRB wenig bewegt wird. So wird man versuchen, alle knappen Rohstoffe in Zukunft zu managen.
>Das Managment: Zusammenwirken? von Notenbanken, Banken, Aktienfirmen usw.
>1. In Rohstoffe strömendes fiat money wäre der Kollaps des"freien" Marktes.
>2. Knappe Rohstoffe lassen sich nicht durch Geld vermehren. Ein Wettbewerb darum mit Geld ist zwar systemkonform, erhöht aber nur den CRB. Man treibt keinen Preis hoch, ohne zu profitieren.
>Beispiel SILBER:
>Spare mir das aufzählen, mir bekannter, sinnvoller Neuanwendungen, besonders bei derzeitigen Preisen.
>Es gibt nur eine Erklärung dafür, daß man von allem die Finger läßt. Es sind keine ausreichenden Silbermengen beschaffbar.
>Eine Preisvervielfachung würde das Silberangebot nicht erhöhen. Silber fällt bekanntlich unabhängig vom Preis, aber zwangsläufig, fast nur als Nebenprodukt an. Keine Kupfer-, Blei- oder Zinkmine erhöht die Produktion wegen des Nebenproduktes Silber.
>Fiktiv:
>Was nĂĽtzt die tollste Silberwunderbatterie, wenn sie wg. hohem Ag-Anteil niemand bezahlen kann?
>Der hohe Preis käme zustande, weil mit einem Kampfpreisen, anderen Verbrauchern das Silber vorenthalten würde.
>Aus Einsicht, mit Mehrkosten nicht mehr Material/Provit zu erhalten, verzichtet man gleich auf höheren Verbrauch. (Lieber Filme verkaufen, als auf unbezahlbaren Batterien zu sitzen).
>Sogar ein weiterer Preisverfall wäre denkbar. Den sehen wir sogar.
>Warum?
>Wie gesagt: Die Nebenproduktion bei Zink, Blei und Kupfer läuft preisunabhängig weiter.
>Nun komme niemand mit Charts und Zyklen.
>Buffet, Soros, sogar Gates haben sich einen (kleinen) Silberteil gesichert und belassen es dabei.
>Kapitalkräftige,"unabhängige", Insider würden sich einen Dreck um Zyklen und Charts kümmern. Die würden kaufen. Sie wissen warum sie nicht auf Teufel komm raus kaufen
>Der Preis bewegt sich wenig.
>Es wird und kann einfach nicht mehr Silber verbraucht werden. Es ist nicht da.
>Wo möglich, werden Ersatzstoffe eingesetzt.
>Oder kann sich jemand den Internetboom vorstellen, wenn für jeden PC 1kg Silber nötig wäre?
>Dieser Boom wäre nicht finanzierbar gewesen und in Realität einfach am Silbermangelgescheitert.
>So, soll mal genug Frust abgelassen sein.
>m
<center>
<HR>
</center> |
WEEKLY COMMENTARY
January 15, 2001
ROUGH AND TUMBLE
Over the last few months Investment Rarities has been promoting the case for
silver made by analyst Theodore Butler. However, we haven’t blindly accepted his
arguments without challenges. We have argued about many of his points and
vigorously questioned others. For the most part, we have been impressed on how
well Mr. Butler stood his ground and how forcefully he made his case. Frankly,
we haven't been able to trip him up.
Here’s an example. Just before Christmas I got a call from a woman at a major
bullion bank that handled the leasing of gold for central banks. A friend of hers
had received our silver mailing and was planning to buy some silver. But first she
had checked with her friend the banker. This woman had shot the idea down.
Now the banker was calling to straighten me out on exactly how the leasing of
gold and silver worked. We had quite a lengthy and vigorous discussion. One
thing was certain, she knew what she was talking about and had indeed been
intricately involved in major gold leasing deals.
I asked her if I could call her back in a day or two with Mr. Butler on the line.
She gave me her toll free number. Subsequently, I called her and introduced her
to Ted Butler. She immediately admonished him for making claims that leasing
was fraudulent and unworkable. She claimed we looked stupid for making such
claims."We laugh at such things," she told us.
Mr. Butler humbly responded that he was probably not as sophisticated as she
was but that he would like to ask her a few questions about silver leasing."You
agree," he suggested,"that an equivalent of two years of silver production has
been leased by silver mines."
"Yes."
"And that silver is gone, it’s been sold and used up, right?"
"Yes," again.
"And it must eventually be repaid, right?"
"Yes."
"And the silver users, the public and industrial users need this production."
"Of course."
"Then I ask you what happens when the mines who leased and sold the silver
now use their production to pay back the silver? What do the users do when they
can’t get the silver they need because the silver miners are using that silver to pay
back the silver they leased?"
There was a long silence. Suddenly she began to talk about Warren Buffett.
"That’s a completely different issue," Butler reminded her.
"I have to go," she said."I have two lines on hold."
That was it. I was exultant. Ted Butler had asked her a question she couldn’t
answer and had probably never even thought of."It’s always the same," he told
me,"they refuse to acknowledge the problem with leasing."
Later that day I rolled that conference call over in my mind. I called Ted Butler."I
have the answer she should have given you."
"What’s that?"
"They (the mining companies) are going to pay it back out of new production.
That’s what it’s all about. They won’t deprive the industrial users."
"Except," he responded,"overall production is stagnant. In fact, exploration
budgets have been cut over 70% in the past few years. Gold mines are closing
and new silver mines are years away from completion. You can’t look at just one
mining company. You have to look at it in total. It can’t be repaid from total
production without taking it away from someone who needs it."
I relaxed once again. Mr. Butler had parried my every thrust and had even left a
silver and gold leasing specialist without an adequate response. That’s the kind of
reassurance I’ve sought time and again while spreading Mr. Butler’s views about
silver’s potential.
Recently we had one of our typical discussions where I questioned and prodded
him.
Cook: Someone said to me that your claim of $50 to $100 silver doesn’t sound
believable. They said a triple to $15 an ounce would have more credibility.
Butler: They just don’t understand the dynamics of the silver market.
Cook: You’re sticking to your guns?
Butler: Absolutely. Listen, I take a lot of heat for my $100 an ounce projection.
In reality, the silver situation is so bullish I believe it will be worth more than $100
an ounce. But I’m not saying that.
Cook: When can we expect this price event to happen?
Butler: I think that once it starts to rise it will take as long as two years to reach
these high levels. I’m not projecting it to go this high in a month or two. It took
palladium five years to go from $120 to $1,000.
Cook: You’re not comparing the two are you?
Butler: I certainly am. They have a number of things in common.
Cook: Such as?
Butler: They’re both mined as byproducts, they are two of the six precious
metals, they’re both white and industry uses small amounts of both per
application, so they are price inelastic.
Cook: But there’s so much more silver.
Butler: That’s an obvious difference. Want some more differences?
Cook: Sure.
Butler: Palladium doesn’t have the world’s largest short position as does silver,
nor do six billion people see palladium as a financial holding as they do silver and
silver has extremely high leasing levels that palladium doesn’t have.
Cook: In effect you’re suggesting that silver has so much going for it that the
price can see the kind of percentage gains that palladium has experienced.
Butler: Silver has more in common with palladium than it does with gold. Ten
years ago palladium was twelve times more expensive than silver. Now it’s two
hundred and seventeen times more expensive. Yes indeed, silver has a lot of
catching up to do.
Cook: Silver dropped a few pennies recently. Why is that?
Butler: First you need to know that 95% of these short-term price movements
take place on the New York Comex, the commodity exchange.
Cook: That’s where the price changes, but it’s not why. I’m asking why silver
dropped several cents.
Butler: I’m trying to answer. The main two trading groups on the Comex are the
big bullion dealers such as Goldman, Sachs, AIG, and the two Morgans. Then
there’s the big hedge funds.
Cook: Hedge funds?
Butler: Sure, they trade back and forth with the big bullion dealers.
Cook: And that’s what’s causing those small price movements in silver?
Butler: Yes. The hedge funds go long or short tens of thousands of contracts
based on technical considerations like price momentum and moving averages.
Cook: They have no real affinity for silver?
Butler: Absolutely not. They don’t look at fundamentals. They trade trends and
price changes.
Cook: How big is their impact?
Butler: It’s everything, almost 100% of the reason for any price change.
Cook: So the reason that silver went down a few cents recently is that these
commercial hedge funds increase their short position. They sold silver contracts
with the aim of buying them back later at a cheaper price. This selling is what
caused the price to fall a bit recently?
Butler: Right!
Cook: Will they make money with this strategy?
Butler: Probably not. It’s usually the big bullion dealers that make the money on
these silver transactions. The hedge funds have huge amounts of contracts on
maybe thirty different commodities. They take the average performance and don’t
worry about one commodity.
Cook: In effect, the public and the industrial users of silver have very little
impact on silver prices.
Butler: As it stands now, that’s correct.
Cook: Will that change?
Butler: Well, first of all let me say that this type of commodity market has
evolved over the past fifteen years and it goes against commodity exchange laws
to keep outsiders and people not in the business of the particular commodity from
determining the price.
Cook: Can this change?
Butler: It’s a complete contradiction of commodity law and it’s cockeyed to say
the least.
Cook: Yes, but can this change? How are we going to get past this complicated
and obtuse silver market these big guys have all to themselves? How are we going
to overcome this obstacle and make some money?
Butler: All cockeyed schemes end, they eventually collapse. We don’t have to do
any more than get the word out. The market will take care of it. We have a
powerful wind at our back.
Cook: You mean the supply-demand situation?
Butler: Yes. We have a tremendous industrial shortage of silver, we’ve depleted
the above-ground supply, but it hasn’t been recognized yet.
Cook: Why not?
Butler: This is what everyone who owns silver must grasp. The existence of
metals leasing released inventory onto the market with no regard for price. It held
the price down in an artificial manner. All that silver must be paid back and when
that begins to happen, the price will explode.
Cook: That’s just one factor of many.
Butler: Yes, there are others, but that will cause the biggest bang.
Cook: It seems like there is a big paper market of commodities trading in silver
and then there’s the real market of actual silver.
Butler: That’s right. And this paper trading is the wrong pricing mechanism for
silver. It’s backward.
Cook: How do you mean?
Butler: The Comex is setting the price for the physical market and it should be
the other way around.
Cook: So we’re getting a false price?
Butler: Yes, that’s my point. That’s why you have such an opportunity. The
current market price reflects something other than what the price would be if
actual silver were changing hands.
Cook: You’re saying it would be a lot higher.
Butler: Sure, but this can change instantly and make up lost ground. When it
does the paper traders will be shocked and will lose a lot of money.
Cook: So, we are going to go back to a true market?
Butler: Exactly. Supply and demand for actual silver will ultimately determine the
price. We don’t need any outside help, we don’t need a miracle, we only need
recognition of the problem and understanding of the realities of silver.
Cook: Then what?
Butler: Then people will buy more and more silver and that will be one important
factor in driving up the price.
Cook: There must be some price point in your mind where these big commercial
shorts, the hedge funds, start to buy silver contracts to cover their short position.
Butler: I would say $4.75 to $5.00.
Cook: Would that get us on our way?
Butler: In the past ten years the hedge funds have been whipsawed at least a
dozen times and we’ve had moves of $.50 to $1.00.
Cook: What would make silver move beyond that this time?
Butler: The demand pressures keep building.
Cook: In October 1999 we saw gold jump $50 within a few weeks. This was
short covering. The leasing and hedging strategies you warn about ruined
Cambior and Ashanti. But gold got knocked down again because of concerted
selling by the big Wall Street firms. Some are calling it manipulation. Why
wouldn’t the same thing happen with silver and its price drop back?
Butler: It won’t happen because the Central Banks are not known to have huge
quantities of silver left as they do gold.
Cook: So silver can’t be put back in the box, so to speak?
Butler: When silver comes out of the box it’s not going back in. It can’t be
controlled.
Cook: It seems there’s just so many favorable arguments for silver now that
make it superior to other precious metals.
Butler: It’s such an important metal in the electronics industry. It conducts
electricity better than anything, it’s malleable but it doesn’t fatigue, and it won’t
corrode. It’s just an amazing metal. It holds up to temperature extremes and it
conducts heat. It’s strong, but at the same time it can be stretched and formed. It
has a long life and it doesn’t wear. I could go on and on.
Cook: It’s also used in photography, as we all know.
Butler: Yes. It’s light-sensitive and reflects light like nothing else. It’s truly a
miraculous metal.
Cook: Its industrial uses seem to grow every year.
Butler: Hey, it’s in every wall switch, every TV, every telephone, every washing
machine, and on and on. It’s found in every home in a hundred places and has 30
or 40 applications in a single automobile.
Cook: Given the fact that it has such great industrial use and it’s also a monetary
metal, which up until 1965 was actual money in the U.S., it seems to combine the
most important demand factors, more so than any other metal.
Butler: Absolutely. This metal has so much going for it that the price today
doesn’t make sense. You have a chance for an explosive price rise. Here’s what
you need to get across to your customers. If you buy 3,000 ounces of silver
now, when it gets to $100 an ounce, you have $300,000. That will pay for your
kids education, improve your retirement, enhance your lifestyle and do all kinds of
things for you.
Cook: Of course, as a company we can never promise that kind of gain.
Butler: You can’t but I can. Listen, I’m telling these people who call me that
silver is going to explode. There’s just no other way. Look at the facts. This is an
asset that will do so much for you financially. It’s perhaps the best retirement
asset that you can tuck away.
Cook: I like your enthusiasm.
Butler: The world’s close to running out of enough silver to meet everyone’s
needs. Plus, you have all this artificial market manipulation that’s impeding what
would have been a normal price rise. One of these days in the not-too-distant
future the law of supply and demand will trump all other factors and those who
own silver will be fortunate indeed.
Cook: What do you think the downside risk is here? What kind of risk do people
take on at the current price under $5.00?
Butler: I don’t see how anyone can get hurt. Basically, what we have is a low
risk vehicle that could change one’s financial life dramatically. That’s what you
have to communicate.
Cook: You certainly make the strongest arguments I’ve ever heard for precious
metals. You argue relentlessly and you take no prisoners.
Butler: Yes, I’m more focused than ever. I figured this leasing fiasco out years
before anyone else. I’ve known how bullish the case was for silver for a long
time. Now I’m starting to develop a following. This is the time to get the message
across. I just don’t believe that I or anyone will ever see an opportunity like silver
is today any time again in our lifetime.
Cook: Any other thoughts?
Butler: Jim, I’d like to raise one last point here, so that there’s no confusion
later. When I recommend silver, I hope everyone knows I mean real silver, and
not a paper version.
Cook: Well, that’s all my firm deals in.
Butler: I know that, but I want to head off heartaches later on, to those who deal
in paper silver in some form. Sometimes I think people don’t even realize they
have paper silver.
Cook: What do you mean?
Butler: Well, there are lots of types of paper silver, including contracts on the
COMEX. First let me say that in the interest of full disclosure I’ve traded and will
trade significant amounts of COMEX silver contracts. For pure speculation they
are perfect. For long-term, low-risk investment, however, they are the worst
thing to undertake. Also, COMEX silver contracts are only one type of paper
silver. Other types would be pool accounts, unallocated certificates, or any type
of silver transaction that involves leverage - where you don’t put up the full
amount, but borrow from the firm to finance the purchase.
Cook: Are you saying avoid this type of paper silver?
Butler: If you know that you are speculating with your eyes wide open, then
fine. But don’t confuse that with a fully paid for position of silver, which is a
great investment. The problem is that folks who are in these paper deals think
they are investing and they are really speculating instead. Things can go wrong
when you get away from a plain vanilla paid-for position.
Cook: Like what?
Butler: What if the COMEX suddenly raises margin requirements in silver, like
they did in palladium? At one point, the NYMEX (parent of the COMEX) raised
margins in palladium contracts to more than the full cash value of a contract, an
unprecedented move. Or, if the COMEX tries to go to cash settlement instead of
physical delivery, like the Tokyo exchange did in palladium, real silver would be
worth a lot more than a piece of silver paper.
Cook: Aren’t there some tax issues?
Butler: Yes, you run an ongoing tax problem with futures and options contracts,
due to"mark to market" on every December 31.
Cook: Any other problems?
Butler: People borrowing from a company they bought silver from take on risks
of that firm running into financial problems that might cause them to lose their
silver. For instance, maybe you can’t come up with a margin call, or the
company goes out of business. Who needs those potential headaches?
Cook: So, don’t borrow money to invest in silver?
Butler: Right. Why complicate the equation? Keep it simple. Pay cash. Secure
storage, go fishing or on a cruise. Don’t mess up the transaction getting fancy.
The worst thing in the world, and it is going to happen, is for people who did
invest in silver to have picked the wrong company or vehicle. There are people
who are going to think they hit it big when silver explodes, only to face misery
later when they realize they were cheated out of deserved profits when a
company goes bankrupt or trading rules are changed abruptly. Be careful out
there.
Cook: I must say that I’ve seen a lot of metal dealers come and go in 30 years.
Butler: And in 30 years I haven’t met that many silver investors who speculated
their way to success. The odds and the rules have been stacked against them.
Owning unencumbered silver improves the odds. This is the one financial asset to
own without anything cute going on. You just won't get another chance like you
have now with silver.
Cook: Thanks, Ted.
BACK
All Rights Reserved © 2000 Investment Rarities, Inc.
For Web Site Questions Contact the Web Master
Disclaimer
<center>
<HR>
</center>
|
Thread-Ansicht
Mix-Ansicht
Reihenfolge
Thread gesperrt
