| Pursuit Of Mediocrity
 THE DAILY RECKONING
 
 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
 
 FRIDAY, 27 JULY 2001
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
 *** The"encircling gloom" encircles more gloom...
 
 *** Retirement plans postponed...but Wall Street more
 bullish than it's been in 16 years...
 
 *** Free"commercial space" in Denver...Centex up 93%...
 and the Daily Reckoner takes a break...
 
 
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
 The Financial Times calls it"the encircling
 gloom"...the earnings announcements continue. Carly
 Fiorina of Hewlett Packard told investors not to expect a
 2nd half recovery. HWP fell 7%.
 
 JDS Uniphase will be a source of interest today,
 after news last night that the company had managed to lose
 $46 a share, a remarkable achievement for a $9 stock.
 
 Dividends from the S&P 500 are off 6.6% this year -
 not since the '70s have dividends dropped as much.
 
 Meanwhile, Wall Street strategists are the most
 bullish they've been in 16 years. But Wall Street analysts,
 once idolized, have become a laughingstock...or a
 scapegoat. The same financial press that reported their
 recommendations as if they were important, now record the
 results of their recommendations with indignation.
 
 Addison, more details on yesterday's Wall Street
 action, please...
 
 *****
 
 Addison Wiggin reports from Paris:
 
 ***"I don't feel too good..." says Tom Ahrens.
 
 Six months ago, Mr. Ahrens, a Canadian soybean farmer, had
 approximately $210,000 in Nortel - comprising about 2/3 of
 his expected retirement funds. Today, his shares are worth
 about $45,000 - and he owes $30,000... to his broker.
 
 "We milked cows for over 10 years," Mr. Ahrens told the
 International Herald Tribune."I should have stayed with
 John Deere."
 
 Nortel's stock - trading at $89 when Tom Ahren's retirement
 years gleemed brightly - now sells for $12.
 
 *** JDS Uniphase announced it's 4th quarter loss had
 reached near $8 billion...HP revised its sales forecast
 downward for the second time this year... and both
 companies announced another round of layoffs.
 
 *** Japanese electronics maker Sony announced a loss of
 $242 million through June. The giant French telecom Alcatel
 weighed in with $2.73 billion in losses. British telecom
 registered a 70% drop in first quarter profits. As Bill
 mentioned yesterday, the only thing new in the"news" these
 days... is the names of companies getting mauled, torn-up
 and spit out by the worldwide depression in telecom...
 
 ***"When Federal Reserve policies create low interest
 rates that lure entrepreneurs into markets that would not
 pay a profit without fiat money, the boom is sure to become
 a bust," writes Gary North."That is what has happened
 to tech stocks. It is what is in the process of happening
 to the conventional markets. I don't mean stock markets as
 such; I mean markets in general, i.e., the economy."
 
 ***"The crucial, precarious aspect of the negative saving
 rate," writes Dr. Richebacher,"is that it reflects an
 unprecedented, bubble-related escalation of consumer
 spending. If the Fed's drastic easing fails to revive the
 bubble, the massive overspending by the consumer will burst
 just like the massive malinvestment of businesses in the
 high tech sector."
 
 
 *** All the same, yesterday on Wall Street the investment
 horde didn't seem to notice. The Dow gained 49 to 10,455;
 the S&P 500 rose 12 to 1,202 and Nasdaq was up 38.64 to
 close at 2,026... even the Russell 2000 and the Amex
 composite rose slightly.
 
 *** John Mauldin points out:"Despite the 20% plus decline
 in the S&P in 2001, the current p/e is 29. Comparatively,
 the average p/e of the S&P during the boom years 1990-
 2000 was 22... even during the greatest bull market in
 stock market history 1980-2000 the average p/e on the
 S&P was 17.
 
 "If the markets dropped to a more historical p/e ratio
 level of just 20 - that would mean a drop to around 900."
 That - if you'll permit me to do the math - is another 25%
 drop from here...
 
 ***"Commercial real estate is quickly becoming the
 proverbial 'next shoe,'" writes Chad Hudson at the Prudent
 Bear."A recent survey indicates the vacancy rate along the
 northwest corridor [In Denver] jumped to a whopping 32%
 from 3.8% at the beginning of the year." According to Chris
 Ball, a real estate analyst in the area,"landlords are
 upfront that you can get six, nine, or 12 months of free
 rent."
 
 ***"Boston is another area that boomed with the
 technology," reports Hudson."Yet the occupancy rate in the
 Greater Boston area declined almost 5% in the first six
 months of the year" with another 8.6% drop in industrial
 space...
 
 *** But consumers are undaunted. Home builder Centex - up
 93% since we first covered it here in the Daily Reckoning -
 reported its best ever first quarter, with sales up 19% and
 backlogs growing 17%. Beazer Homes also announced its best
 ever third quarter with revenue and closings up 15%, new
 orders and backlog - up 34% and 31% respectively.
 
 *** A DR Reader writes:"This is the biggest bubble in
 history. I will wretch if I hear the word 'saving rate'
 again. Walk up to a 60-year-old guy. He'll get about
 $18,000 in SS, he has an IRA with $75,000, his retirement
 from XYZ corp is $20,000 and THE HOUSE HE PAID OFF TWO YEARS
 AGO IS $365,000. Get it yet? Need some help with this? It's
 all about houses and what they are worth, not about
 'savings'. The f***ing house is the savings."
 
 *** Modest question: What happens when on the heels of
 commercial real estate... residential follows?
 
 *****
 
 Back to Bill...
 
 *** It's summertime here in Baltimore. And the livin' is
 easy. The fish are jumpin' and the cotton is high.
 
 Hazy, hot humid weather settled on Baltimore last night,
 like distant relatives arriving for what looked like a long
 visit.
 
 For every advance in human progress, alas, there is a
 retreat. People used to gather on the sidewalks for a
 breath of air in the evenings - and talk. Music would come
 from open windows and the smells of summer living - both
 good and bad - would drift through the fetid air like trash
 floating in the harbor.
 
 But air-conditioning and television changed everything.
 People now stay indoors - watching"Sex and the City" or
 surfing the worldwide web...
 
 Returning from a restaurant late at night, the woman next
 door was sitting out on her marble steps - the way people
 used to do on hot summer nights. She was beautiful, but
 like the neighborhood, touched by decay - a woman who
 looked as though she might have retired from a career in
 Hollywood or perhaps from playing Blanche Dubois in
 regional theatres.
 
 She had a serene look, but also a bit of sadness in her
 eyes...the kind of look people have when they realize that
 they are out of scotch and the liquor stores have closed.
 
 "Nice evening," I said.
 
 "Yes, and so quiet."
 
 "Can I give you a hand?" I asked, noticing that she was
 struggling to open a bottle.
 
 "I have always depended on the kindness of strangers," she
 replied.
 
 PURSUIT OF MEDIOCRITY
 
 "There is always some leveling circumstance."
 
 Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1841
 
 "Napoleon Bonaparte and his generals did an excellent job.
 So masterful were they that they managed to bring an entire
 army all the way across Europe, from Paris to Moscow. What
 a pity they almost all died on the way home."
 
 Bill Bonner, 2001
 
 
 Yesterday's modest insight is followed today by an even more
 modest one:
 
 You should always try to do the best you can, dear reader.
 But there are things at which it is better to fail than to
 succeed...and times when mediocrity beats excellence.
 
 We have enjoyed an excellent boom in America...followed by
 an excellent bubble...followed by an excellent end to the
 bubble.
 
 Shares on the Nasdaq are down more than 50%. Those on the
 Dow have gone nowhere for two and a half years. Will we
 now get to enjoy an excellent bear market...or just a
 mediocre one? Will the boom of the last two decades be
 followed by a truly exceptional bust...or just an ordinary
 one?
 
 The worse thing that can happen to a young man is that he
 succeeds too early and too easily. For he fails to develop
 a proper respect for failure...and sufficient modesty to
 protect him from future mistakes. As Edmund Burke put it,
 "No man had ever a point of pride that was not injurious to
 him."
 
 Facile good fortune has befallen several men of my
 acquaintance - and usually with disastrous results.
 Getting rich too early, they became poor later...when it
 was much more inconvenient.
 
 My own career, as I informed our employees at an annual
 meeting on Wednesday, has been blessed by failure and
 incompetence. A more capable man might have taken a
 different route...marginally succeeding at one task or
 another. But, in my case, my failures were unequivocal - I
 was forced to try something else, eventually stumbling upon
 something that suited me.
 
 As Emerson put it,"Every man in his lifetime needs to
 thank his faults."
 
 All of this is prelude, of course, to revisiting our own
 Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O'Neill, a man who seems to
 have no faults to thank.
 
 Mr. O'Neill's point of pride is that he brings the pursuit
 of excellence to all that he does. There is nothing wrong
 with that, in itself...except that it fails to prepare him
 for a circumstance in which even mediocrity will be an
 improvement.
 
 "We have amazing flexibility in our capital and labor
 markets, broader and deeper capital markets that match
 resources to good ideas faster than anywhere else in the
 world, creating greater return on capital here than
 anywhere else in the world." said the Treasury secretary
 recently. Mr. O'Neill was referring to the same capital
 market matchmaker that put thousands of investors' money
 together with Webvan.com and telecom bonds, now trading at
 pennies on the dollar. But he seemed not to notice.
 
 "We have the world's most productive workers and the
 world's freest labor market. Free markets, productive
 labor and lower taxes will in turn keep capital flowing
 here, even during a downturn like the one we are
 experiencing today."
 
 That may be. Or it may not.
 
 Stephen Roach, appearing before Congress on Wednesday,
 testified as to why even the most excellent treasury
 secretary in America's history may not b able to keep
 capital flowing here:
 
 "The world is in the midst of what could well go down in
 history as the first recession of this modern era of
 globalization. It's a recession whose seeds were sown in
 the depth of the financial crisis of 1997-98.. America
 moved aggressively to save the world nearly three years
 ago, it has paid a steep price for those noble efforts.
 That rescue mission fostered a climate that took the US
 economy to excess -- resulting in a destabilizing asset
 bubble, an overhang of excess capacity, and an
 extraordinary shortfall of consumer saving. It also left
 the United States with its largest balance-of-payments
 deficit in modern history.
 
 In Roach's opinion, the current worldwide slump is the
 result of the excellent management of previous slowdowns by
 previous Treasury secretaries
 
 "It all started in the fall of 1998. The global currency
 crisis that began in Thailand had cascaded around the
 world, eventually leading to Russian debt default and the
 related failure of Long-Term Capital Management. The result
 was what Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan dubbed an
 "unprecedented seizing up of world financial markets." US
 President Bill Clinton and Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin
 went even further, both calling it the world's worst
 financial crisis since the Great Depression.
 
 "The Fed swung into action to save the world, [and] the
 world economy sprang back with a vengeance that few
 anticipated. In the midst of the Fed's emergency easing
 campaign, America's real GDP surged at a 5.6% annual rate
 in the fourth quarter of 1998. Far from faltering, the US
 economy was on a tear. I cannot remember when such an
 aggressive monetary easing had occurred in the context of
 such an outsized gain in economic growth. Although our
 central bank began to take back its extraordinary monetary
 accommodation by mid-1999, by then it was too late -- the
 damage had been done.
 
 Moreover, it was compounded by the Fed's now infamous Y2K
 liquidity injection of late 1999. America was on the brink
 of a runaway boom. A Fed-induced, Nasdaq-led liquidity
 bubble gave rise to the great IT overhang that has since
 wreaked such havoc on the US and the broader global
 economy."
 
 It probably would have been better if the"Committee to
 Save the World" - Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Alan
 Greenspan - had failed. A modest boom would have been
 followed by a modest bust. Instead, they succeeded so well
 that it looked as though the world's central bankers had
 finally mastered the secrets of managed currencies. All
 they had to do was to provide liquidity at crucial moments.
 
 That - and not letting markets run their natural courses -
 became the definition of excellence in central banking.
 And so, investors bought stocks and bonds - particularly in
 the most excellent market in the world, the U.S - while
 consumers bought cars, houses, and whatever else they
 wanted. And here we are.
 
 "The other shoe is about to fall," guesses Roach."That, in
 my opinion is the painful legacy of a financial asset
 bubble that took our real economy to excess. Consumers have
 over-spent. Businesses have over-invested. And the United
 States funded these excesses by borrowing from abroad...
 the math is straight-forward: An ever-widening current-
 account deficit implies that foreign investors will
 ultimately end up"owning" America -- unless, of course,
 something gives. And it usually does."
 
 But Paul O'Neill is not the sort of man to let things
 happen. He would prefer to make them happen."I don't
 think we should accept the notion [of a contagious global
 slowdown] as something God intended for us to have."
 
 Here at the Daily Reckoning, we do not presume to know what
 God intended. But we feel pretty sure that, whatever it
 is, even Paul H. O'Neill's most excellent management will
 not stand in its way.
 
 Your editor,
 
 Bill Bonner
 
 P.S. In a bull market, an investor aims for the stars - for
 excellent returns. But in a bear market, he should lower
 his sights - if he can merely achieve mediocre results, he
 can count himself lucky
 
 P.P.S. Sunday, I leave for a 2 1/2 week vacation. For the
 first time in two years, dear reader, you will get a relief
 from my letters. I hope you will miss me, but the Daily
 Reckoning will continue during my absence with Addison
 reporting from Paris...and Eric from Wall Street.
 
 
 
 
 <center>
 
 <HR>
 
 </center>
 |