Board-Ansicht
Mix-Ansicht- Hochbrisant: Anbieter warnt vor seinen Handys - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 02:31
- hochbrisanter hoax - Rumpelstilzchen, 13.02.2002, 07:30
- Danke für den Blick in die Quellen! Aber: Was sagt der Bauch und die Erfahrung? - Heller, 13.02.2002, 08:43
- Re: Danke für den Blick in die Quellen! Aber: Was sagt der Bauch und die Erfahrung? - Rumpelstilzchen, 13.02.2002, 11:49
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax ist die Hoax, ist die.. - Herbi, dem Bremser, 13.02.2002, 11:01
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax ist die Hoax, ist die.. - Rumpelstilzchen, 13.02.2002, 11:30
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax.. ist keineHoax - Herbi, dem Bremser, 13.02.2002, 12:33
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax.. ist keineHoax - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 14:43
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax.. ist keineHoax - Herbi, dem Bremser, 13.02.2002, 12:33
- Re: hochbrisanter hoax - die Hoax ist die Hoax, ist die.. - Rumpelstilzchen, 13.02.2002, 11:30
- Danke für den Blick in die Quellen! Aber: Was sagt der Bauch und die Erfahrung? - Heller, 13.02.2002, 08:43
- SAR-STRAHLUNGSWERTE FÃœR ALLE HANDYTYPEN GIBT ES HIER - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 18:25
- was kann man tun, wenn man auf ein handy angewiesen ist? DAS: - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 18:35
- Re: was kann man tun, wenn man auf ein handy angewiesen ist? DAS: - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 19:33
- Re: Hochbrisant: Anbieter warnt vor seinen Handys - Phoenix, 13.02.2002, 19:09
- fast vergessen - mrjohns, 13.02.2002, 19:30
- hochbrisanter hoax - Rumpelstilzchen, 13.02.2002, 07:30
hochbrisanter hoax
Ich habe mir mal die Mühe gemacht, Deine Quellen zu checken und im Medline (=Datenbank der weltweiten medizinischen Publikationen) zu checken.
Salford: 6 Publikationen, 0 zu Mobilfunk
Adey: Publikationen, 0 zu Mobilfunk (alles vor 1988!)
Repacholi: 27 Publikationen, davon folgende mit Relevanz für das Thema:
Titel: Health risks from the use of mobile phones.
Autoren: Repacholi MH
Quelle: TOXICOLOGY LETTERS; 120; 1-3; 323-31; 2001 Mar 31
Sprache: English
Institution: Occupational and Environmental Health, World Health Organization, 1211 27, Geneva, Switzerland. repacholim@who.int
Schlagwörter
CT: RADIO WAVES/*adverse effects; TELEPHONE/*; BRAIN/radiation effects; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMAN; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED/etiology; RISK ASSESSMENT; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Sonstige Information
ND: 21223526
PMID: 11323191
SU: Index Medicus
CY: Netherlands
JC: VXN
JID: 7709027
ISSN: 0378-4274
CO: TOLED5
DT: Journal Article; Review; Review, Tutorial
RN: 25
AB: Widespread concerns have been raised about the possibility that exposure to the radiofrequency (RF) fields from mobile telephones or their base stations could affect people's health. Such has been the rapid growth of mobile telecommunications that there will be about one billion mobile phone users before 2005. Already there are more mobile than fixed-line users. Developing countries are establishing mobile telecommunications rather than the more expensive fixed-line systems. Thus, if there is any impact on health from mobile telephones, it will affect everyone in the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) established the International EMF Project in 1996 to evaluate the science, recommend research to fill any gaps in knowledge and to conduct formal health risk assessments of RF exposure once recommended research had been completed. In addition, the UK government established an independent expert group to review all the issues concerning health effects of mobile telephones and siting of base stations. Cancer has been suggested as an outcome of exposure to mobile telephones by some scientific reports. This paper reviews the status of the science and WHO's programme to address the key issues. In addition, the main conclusions and recommendations of the UK expert group will be summarised.
10/4 von 27 DIMDI: MEDLINE (ML66) © NLM
Titel: Cancer from exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields--a major scientific debate.
Autoren: Repacholi MH
Quelle: AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE; 13; 1; 4-17; 1990 Mar
Sprache: English
Institution: Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia.
Schlagwörter
CT: ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS/*adverse effects; NEOPLASMS/*epidemiology; NEOPLASMS/etiology; ANIMAL; ELECTROMAGNETICS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE
Sonstige Information
ND: 90247984
PMID: 2186723
LR: 20001218
SU: Index Medicus
JC: 9GH
JID: 8208130
ISSN: 0158-9938
CO: AUPMDI
DT: Journal Article; Review; Review, Tutorial
RN: 116
AB: Millions of dollars are presently being spent on both laboratory and epidemiological studies to determine if an association exists between the exposure of humans to 50/60 Hz electromagnetic fields and cancer incidence. This review discusses findings from both of these areas of study and focuses attention on their relevance to the electromagnetic field-cancer debate. So far, the conflicting results from epidemiology have succeeded only in raising the concerns of both occupationally exposed groups and the general public. A few hypotheses have suggested possible mechanisms by which fields could exert biological effects. However the studies on which these hypotheses are based require substantiation and further, there is insufficient evidence to indicate if the biological effects observed in these studies have any relevance to human health. It will be at least another three to five years before there are results from large scale human studies presently being designed or undertaken. From an objective review of existing scientific data it can only be concluded that exposure to 50/60 Hz electric and magnetic fields at levels occurring in our environment have not been established to lead to cancer in humans. Sufficient gaps in our knowledge exist however to recommend that research continue, especially in areas identified in the text. To assist the casual reader of this subject the complex issues of cancer initiation and promotion are considered.
10/5 von 27 DIMDI: MEDLINE (ML66) © NLM
Titel: A test of lymphoma induction by long-term exposure of E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice to 50 Hz magnetic fields.
Autoren: Harris AW; Basten A; Gebski V; Noonan D; Finnie J; Bath ML; Bangay MJ; Repacholi MH
Quelle: RADIATION RESEARCH; 149; 3; 300-7; 1998 Mar
Sprache: English
Institution: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Schlagwörter
CT: ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS/*; LYMPHOMA/etiology; LYMPHOMA/*genetics; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED/*genetics; PROTO-ONCOGENES/*; SERINE ENDOPEPTIDASES/*genetics; ANIMAL; BODY WEIGHT/radiation effects; FEMALE; KIDNEY DISEASES/etiology; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TIME FACTORS
TE: Serine Endopeptidases/E.C. 3.4.21; PIM1 protein/E.C. 3.4.21.-
Sonstige Information
ND: 98156608
PMID: 9496894
LR: 20001218
SU: Index Medicus
JC: QMP
JID: 0401245
ISSN: 0033-7587
CO: RAREAE
DT: Journal Article
AB: E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice expressing a dysregulated Pim1 oncogene in their lymphoid cells were used to test whether exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields can increase the frequency of malignant lymphoma in mice of a strain predisposed to develop such tumors spontaneously at low incidence. Specific-pathogen-free female mice were allocated randomly into groups of approximately 100 at 6-8 weeks of age and then exposed for 20 h/day for up to 18 months to sinusoidal magnetic fields of 0, 1, 100 or 1000 microT, or 1000 microT pulsed 15 min on and 15 min off. Additional E mu-Pim1 mice were injected with ethylnitrosourea (50 mg/kg body weight) as positive controls for enhanced lymphomagenesis; these yielded a cumulative incidence of lymphoma of 60% in 9 months. A lethal, transgene-dependent renal glomerular disease occurred at a frequency that varied from 9% to 19% among the groups, but the increase was statistically significant only at the 1000-microT exposure. Lymphoblastic and non-lymphoblastic (predominantly follicular) lymphomas were seen in 26 to 35% of the exposed mice, but at no significantly higher incidence than the 29% found in the sham-exposed mice. Hence we conclude that the lymphoma-prone mice did not reveal any tumorigenic effect of long-term exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields.
10/10 von 27 DIMDI: MEDLINE (ML66) © NLM
Titel: Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.
Autoren: Repacholi MH
Quelle: BIOELECTROMAGNETICS; 19; 1; 1-19; 1998
Sprache: English
Institution: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. repacholim@who.ch
Schlagwörter
CT: CLINICAL PROTOCOLS/*; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS/*adverse effects; RADIO WAVES/*adverse effects; ANIMAL; AUSTRIA; BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER/drug effects; CELL CYCLE/radiation effects; CELL MEMBRANE/radiation effects; FEMALE; GENES/drug effects; GERMANY; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; HUMAN; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED/epidemiology; NEOPLASMS, RADIATION-INDUCED/etiology; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTORS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TELEPHONE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Sonstige Information
ND: 98114447
PMID: 9453702
LR: 20001218
SU: Index Medicus
JC: 9Z7
JID: 8008281
ISSN: 0197-8462
CO: BLCTDO
DT: Journal Article; Review; Review, Academic
RN: 127
AB: The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), and the German and Austrian Governments jointly sponsored an international seminar in November of 1996 on the biological effects of low-level radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. For purposes of this seminar, RF fields having frequencies only in the range of about 10 MHz to 300 GHz were considered. This is one of a series of scientific review seminars held under the International Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Project to identify any health hazards from EMF exposure. The scientific literature was reviewed during the seminar and expert working groups formed to provide a status report on possible health effects from exposure to low-level RF fields and identify gaps in knowledge requiring more research to improve health risk assessments. It was concluded that, although hazards from exposure to high-level (thermal) RF fields were established, no known health hazards were associated with exposure to RF sources emitting fields too low to cause a significant temperature rise in tissue. Biological effects from low-level RF exposure were identified needing replication and further study. These included in vitro studies of cell kinetics and proliferation effects, effects on genes, signal transduction effects and alterations in membrane structure and function, and biophysical and biochemical mechanisms for RF field effects. In vivo studies should focus on the potential for cancer promotion, co-promotion and progression, as well as possible synergistic, genotoxic, immunological, and carcinogenic effects associated with chronic low-level RF exposure. Research is needed to determine whether low-level RF exposure causes DNA damage or influences central nervous system function, melatonin synthesis, permeability of the blood brain barrier (BBB), or reaction to neurotropic drugs. Reported RF-induced changes to eye structure and function should also be investigated. Epidemiological studies should investigate: the use of mobile telephones with hand-held antennae and incidence of various cancers; reports of headache, sleep disturbance, and other subjective effects that may arise from proximity to RF emitters, and laboratory studies should be conducted on people reporting these effects; cohorts with high occupational RF exposure for changes in cancer incidence; adverse pregnancy outcomes in various highly RF exposed occupational groups; and ocular pathologies in mobile telephone users and in highly RF exposed occupational groups. Studies of populations with residential exposure from point sources, such as broadcasting transmitters or mobile telephone base stations have caused widespread health concerns among the public, even though RF exposures are very low. Recent studies that may indicate an increased incidence of cancer in exposed populations should be investigated further.
Zusammenfassend: wissenschaftliche Leichtgewichte, keine gesicherten Aussagen, viel Paranoia.
Und dann dieser Quatsch mit EEG-Veränderungen. Unterstes Bildzeitungsniveau (sorry dottore), jedes elektromagnetische Feld stört das EEG, am meisten das Feld des Herzens.
Leider kann hier jeder ungeprüft jeden Müll abladen, geglaubt wird das meiste sowieso, traurig, traurig
R.
<center>
<HR>
</center>
Thread gesperrtgesamter Thread:
