- Ein Telefon Interview zu der"Federal Reserve" - marsch, 25.09.2002, 20:08
- Re: Ein Telefon Interview zu der"Federal Reserve" - --- ELLI ---, 25.09.2002, 22:18
- es ist ein Fake - nasdaq, 26.09.2002, 00:55
- Artikel 1, Abschnitt 1 und 8 der Verfassung - Ivan, 25.09.2002, 22:31
- Vergleich 1787 vs. 1861. - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 00:49
- Für R.Deutsch: Artikel 1, Abschnitt 10.1 - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 03:38
- Re: Danke Ivan - R.Deutsch, 26.09.2002, 09:33
- Re: Gerne geschehen, R.Deutsch - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 14:59
- Re: Für R.Deutsch: Artikel 1, Abschnitt 10.1 - Euklid, 26.09.2002, 09:55
- Re: Für R.Deutsch: Artikel 1, Abschnitt 10.1 - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 14:51
- Re: Danke Ivan - R.Deutsch, 26.09.2002, 09:33
- Für R.Deutsch: Artikel 1, Abschnitt 10.1 - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 03:38
- Vergleich 1787 vs. 1861. - Ivan, 26.09.2002, 00:49
- Habe das Original gefunden. - marsch, 26.09.2002, 08:59
- Re: Ein Telefon Interview zu der"Federal Reserve" - --- ELLI ---, 25.09.2002, 22:18
Habe das Original gefunden.
--><table>
<table border="0" width="600">
<tr>
<td> <font size=5><font face=arial></font></font>
<div align="justify">
~ <a target="_blank" href=http://www.rense.com/general29/ringring.htm>Hier</a></li>
Keine Ahnung ob das wirklich ein Fake ist. Jedenfalls ist dort noch ein Kommentar angehängt:
Comment
From Dave Williams
Williams.Dave@orbital.com
9-17-2
Jeff,
I would like to comment on the attached article posted to your website.
I am an avid reader of your site and think that some of the articles you have posted have some merit behind them. Others are written and posted by fear-mongers who offer no solutions to the problems they encounter. This one, however, seems to at least be taking a stand to introduce legislation to turn the tide on the greedy, robber barons of our time. But I would like to put to rest something that has been commented for a long time in various postings to your website that has had me pegged for some time and has been completely untrue. Whenever anyone talks about the Constitutional rights of Congress to coin money and regulate the value thereof, they always state that the Federal Reserve Banks (not being an actual part of the government) have not been duly authorized to perform these functions and the sole right must remain with Congress. They site the Constitution itself (Article I, Section 8, paragraph 5) as being the law of the land (which it duly is) for the legality of the Federal Reserve Banking system. For the life of me, however, it seems that they quit reading at this point, because the 18th and final paragraph of Section 8 states:
"To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof."
Now, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but I can read plain English. This paragraph clearly shows how farsighted the Constitutional framers were in the fact that they new that the Constitution, while a great start to this republic, was not the answer for every legality to come up in the future. This paragraph clearly shows also, that the Congress had the right to legislate the power for coining money and its denominatory value to other persons or businesses that were capable of doing so by"carrying into execution the foregoing powers", i.e. - the right to coin money and its value. This final paragraph also means not just the entire Section 8, but any part of the Constitution pertaining to the making of laws vested in the power of these United States by the Constitution.
Why is it nobody ever comments on this paragraph? Could it be that they just want to sow fear and hatred in their fellow Americans for the government, all the while knowing they are wrong? Or are they just plain ignorant and believe what they want to? I for one, feel the government is doing a pretty good job of bringing a total disenchantment between them and the people of this country. Why do think almost half the voting population doesn't vote? I can tell you. They don't like who they are voting for in either party!
Again, I'll state for the record, I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but a Design Engineer and while not presuming that I know more than our duly appointed Congressional Members, I do know from where right and wrong is and where the laws currently stand on this. Which is to say once and for all, that the Federal Reserve Banking System is completely lawful!
Now, do I agree with and like the current system? NO!! But do we have to accept that it is and has been the law since its enactment? YES! Now, I'm not going to split hairs with anyone over whether or not it was duly ratified by the 2/3rds margin of each states' legislative group, but until the people of this country wake up and take back their constitutional rights', as in"We the people, by the people" we cannot expect these changes to be made on our behalf. At least the esteemed Rep Ron Paul is on the right track in trying to get the laws changed legally. Now, whether he will suceed or not will depend on the people of this country. If we remain asleep at the wheel, so to say, then we shall not. There has to be a common goal and enough backing to make this happen! Wake up America!
Dave Williams
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

gesamter Thread: