Interessanter Briefwechsel mit E-Gold

verfasst von Theo Stuss, 01.10.2003, 18:49

-->Zuerst kommen die schon bekannten juristischen Ratschläge:

In order to ensure you get all pertinent information when issuing the
subpoena to e-gold Ltd please:

- Ask for e-gold account profile information for account #872773
- Ask for transaction history information for account #872773
- Ask for information on any other accounts owned or controlled by the
individual
- Ask for Disposition of funds in questions"what account are the funds
currently located, this is in case they have been moved around"
- Ask for stabilization of the funds in question"freezing of the account if
the funds are still under the control of the perpetrator"
- Ask for account profile information for the account where the funds are
currently located. This will be needed in case you have to subpoena the
third party account owner.

This court order should be presented by fax (initially) and then with hard
copy to: etc....

Darauf meine Rückfrage:

Good morning,


Is there any hope of success, if I take legal action, or is your advice just
a sort of psychological tittytainment?


Best Regards,

Und darauf die folgende Antwort von E-Gold:

e-gold spends are final and not reversible as stated in the e-gold user
agreement. There is a chance that even with a court order or subpoena you
may not be able to retrieve your funds.

Regards,
e-gold Service

[b] Irreversible sind sind SPENDS natürlich nur bei E-Gold, aber man hat anscheinend ein Interesse, dass ich klein beigebe. Wie Gerichte das sehen, wenn der Verdacht besteht, jemand hat sich illegal des Passwortes bemächtigt, weiss ich nicht. So folgt mein letztes Wort./b>

The fact that spends are final concerns your responsibility, as far as you
are concerned. You are not the one to be legally responsible for damages, ok!

So why do you suggest to me taking legal action, if there is no chance, as
you say now?
Do you believe that this is a good pubilicity for you? In the economic
German discussion boards, which I frequent on the internet these things are
now widely discussed. If you are not able to supply a concept of security
which includes the customer, on a long term others will run you out, who
will do that (meaning, supplying sufficient security). As so far smart cards are the only solution.

So I did take legal action against Mr Hirsch. I went to the police. The
procedure will go to court, from there to the American embassy and to the
embassy of the Bermudas and from there to the various courts in both
countries.

What do you know about jurisprudence in those cases? How does this go
together with Patriot Act I and II?

Best Regards,

Thread gesperrt

 

gesamter Thread:

• Interessanter Briefwechsel mit E-Gold - Theo Stuss, 01.10.2003, 18:49
  • Re: Theo,... - Tassie Devil, 01.10.2003, 20:06
    • Re: Vielleicht hast Du Recht? - Theo Stuss, 01.10.2003, 21:50
      • Deswegen habe ich keine VISA o.ä. mehr - LenzHannover, 03.10.2003, 00:12
    • § 812 BGB! - WebDiver, 01.10.2003, 23:43
      • Re: § 812 BGB! - rodex, 02.10.2003, 01:58
      • Re: Den § 812 BGB? - Tassie Devil, 02.10.2003, 02:56
        • Re: Den § 812 BGB? - WebDiver, 02.10.2003, 22:48