Board-Ansicht
Mix-Ansicht- David Kay im Wortlaut: - Emerald, 03.10.2003, 07:53
- Re: David Kay im Wortlaut: - CRASH_GURU, 03.10.2003, 09:55
Re: David Kay im Wortlaut:
-->JAY ROCKEFELLER: Dr Kay is essentially saying I need a lot more time in order to find out whether he can find any evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Well, ladies and gentleman, that's the reason we went to war, and that's the reason that some of us voted on that authorisation bill. To be where we are today without any evidence, talking about intent, talking about facilities, but nothing we can point to, and then asking for another six or nine months and a good deal of money leads me to believe that we need to do some serious thinking about the doctrine of pre-emption, that we need to do some serious thinking about where did our intelligence allow us to get so that we could make these kinds of conclusions, that we would decide to go to war? Did we misread it? Or did they mislead us? Or did they simply get it wrong? Whatever the answer is, it's not a good answer.
Die Rockefellers & Co sind wohl nicht mehr so ganz happy mit Dubya.
Vielleicht wird ja zur Abwechslung mal ein republikanischer Präsident erschossen. Wäre auch sicher sehr positiv für den Wahlsieg einer anderen republikanischen Marionette in 2004...[img][/img]
Thread gesperrtgesamter Thread:
