- Nibiru-Newsletter - Amanito, 17.11.2003, 12:31
- Amanito, bitte NICHT ungeprüft alles glauben! Z.B. dieser Uvarov... - RK, 17.11.2003, 18:47
- stimmt, aber selbiges gilt für Lloyd - Amanito, 18.11.2003, 11:42
- Amanito, bitte NICHT ungeprüft alles glauben! Z.B. dieser Uvarov... - RK, 17.11.2003, 18:47
Amanito, bitte NICHT ungeprüft alles glauben! Z.B. dieser Uvarov...
-->The 'Installation' and Planet X
One of the speakers at Laughlin was a Russian called Valery Uvarov who has been a full-time Ufologist since 1989. He has been involved in various organisations devoted to the study of anomalous phenomena, and says that he heads 'The Department for Investigation of Extraterrestrial Civilisation under the Russian Academy of Sciences' (See Donald Ware's review of the 2003 Laughlin Conference ). Ware notes that Uvarov became the head of the Department of UFO Research, Paleosciences and Paleotechnology for the 'National Security Academy' of Russia in 2002. This sounds like quite a prestigious post, offering Uvarov much credibility among Ufologists in the West. The organisation is based in St Petersberg in Russia, but when one of my correspondents tried to reach Valery Uvarov there he was told that they had never heard of him, but that Uvarov might work for their Moscow office. Well, not according to Uvarov, himself anyway.
So although I have no doubt that Valery Uvarov is a Ufologist, I find that I am unable to verify that he is a bona fide scientist working for a major Russian scientific establishment. He claims that the Academy is an official Russian government agency, and his superiors are answerable to President Putin himself. This is important because Uvarov has some pretty incredible things to say. For starters, he stunned Graham 'Dubya' Birdsall by making off-the-cuff references to Nazis in Antarctica (See 'Secrets of Antarctica' pp4-8 UFO Mag Apr 2003). Birdsall interviewed Uvarov at Laughlin (See 'The Installation', pp60-1, UFO Mag Apr 2003) and quizzed Uvarov about his belief in an 'Installation' in Siberia that 'shot down' the Tunguska meteor of 1908. This interview has since appeared in Nexus magazine (Nexus June-July, pp59-60) and will be followed up in the next issue with more information.
Surely this is not orthodox Russian scientific opinion? Uvarov ofered no proof to substantiate his wild claims; no satellite imagery of the alleged site, no published or unpublished scientific reports...nothing. Instead he claimed to have visited the extremely remote location, even by Russian standards, twice. The fact that he seems to be getting taken very seriously is because of his claimed qualifications, and position within the Russian academic community.
According to Uvarov the 'Installation' is intimately connected with Planet X:
GWB:"Are you aware of strange stories or rumours concerning the so-called 'Planet X'? If some new and heavenly body had entered our Solar System, astronomers would surely detect it and declare its presence."
Valery Uvarov:"I cannot speak for astronomers in the West, but astronomers within our Academy tell us we have nothing to fear. I have heard people talk about a rotation figure of 3,600 years for this planet, which is in a similar orbit to that of the Earth, but behind the Sun. We know that this planet and the installation in Siberia are closely connected. Let me say that we believe that this installation is keeping that planet in a stable orbit. If the planet were to move, to shift orbit, the entire Solar System would become unstable. Those of us in the Academy are sure that this planet is inhabited, and that this installation is designed to protect them, and us..."
Taken on face value it would appear that one of Russia's leading scientists is advocating an alien base on Earth placed there by the Anunnaki of Nibiru. But there are some very big problems with Uvarov's claims. How could a planet in a 3600 year orbit be located 'behind the Sun'? Surely its position will remain relatively static against the background field of stars, against which the Sun is seen to move along the ecliptic. In a metaphorical way Nibiru could be said to be a 'planet behind the Sun', as in ancient North American Indian beliefs, in that it remains hidden for the vast majority of its lengthy orbit, but it could not be said to be physically located behind the Sun. It is certainly not in a"similar orbit to that of the Earth". No way. And if Uvarov is imparting knowledge given him by astronomers working for a prestigious scientific oganisation in Russia, then he is either misunderstanding what they are telling him, or else they aren't proper astronomers.
Secondly, how could an 'Installation' based on Earth be able to prevent an orbit shift of a rogue planet at the edges of the solar system? One could imagine how it might shoot down incoming meteors, but not ward off the attention of a whole planet. However, Uvarov does mention one piece of speculation that I would agree with, and might even have been gleaned from the Dark Star Theory site in the first place;
"If the planet were to move, to shift orbit, the entire Solar System would become unstable."
He also goes on to discuss a prior orbital change 12,500 years ago that changed the number of days in a year from 360 to our current 365.25. This, he claims, was the result of an asteroid impact, but offers no evidence to support the theory of such a recent collision. Again, this material does relate to ideas discussed on this site regarding the end of the last Ice Age, and orbital changes caused by Nibiru.
In this regard, I think it's fair to say that Uvarov is reading about theories relating to Nibiru on the Internet and extrapolating them into his own alien base theories. This seems more the work of an independent Ufologist than a scientist working for a recognised national research organisation like the Russian Academy of Sciences.
I then received word from a leading Russian author that my suspicions about Valery Uvarov are well founded. The organisation he is said to be involved with, the 'National Security Academy', is not a bona fide scientific body at all, and Uvarov's claims to be working under the auspices of the prestigious Russian Academy of Sciences seem equally dubious. This brings into question Uvarov's entire set of claims, and his assertions should be treated with the upmost caution. I personally wonder whether this questionable testimony by Valery Uvarov is the latest attampt at littering the field of Planet X research with outright disinformation.
Here's a an official Russian document about the 'National Security Academy' obtained from the tax office, which keeps information on the work carried out by all registered companies:
[img][/img]
This document was obtained for me by a Russian researcher who knows Valery Uvarov, but who wishes to remain anonymous for now. It is his opinion that Uvarov's claims regarding his career in Russian science are questionable, which would then bring doubt upon the remarkable speculations he has introduced to the alternative science media in the West. This document shows that the National Security Academy in St Petersburg have no interest in UFOs, or related research. I have written to Valery Uvarov via e-mail to ask him about all of this, and I copied the enquiry and this document to UFO Magazine, NEXUS magazine and to the organisers of the Laughlin conference in the U.S. To date I have had no reply from Uvarov, which has further hieghtened my concern. Here are his e-mail addresses should anyone else wish to also pursue this matter:
horus@mail.admiral.ru
ppiicufi@admiral.ru
In the meantime I would recommend that claims made by Valery Uvarov are taken with a large pinch of salt, at least until he makes some efforts to substantiate them.
© Andy Lloyd 13th April 2003, updated 20th June 2003
<ul> ~ http://www.darkstar1.co.uk/Laughlin.html</ul>

gesamter Thread: