- Tax revenues in New Zealand - CRASH_GURU, 20.08.2004, 15:50
- Auf nach Neuseeland!!! - alberich, 20.08.2004, 16:05
- Hehe. Genau diese Reaktion haben die sich erhofft. - Burning_Heart, 20.08.2004, 16:23
- wenn man denn die Antipoden-Variante von Rot-Grün(Betonung auf Grün) mag.. - kingsolomon, 20.08.2004, 16:35
- Nur nicht so eilig - Diogenes, 20.08.2004, 16:38
- Re: Äwe! und wenn der Exoten-Lack erst mal ab ist... - kingsolomon, 20.08.2004, 16:55
- Re: Nur nicht so eilig - SchlauFuchs, 20.08.2004, 17:46
- na ja, ich weiss nicht, wie Euklid auf eine Furzsteuer gegen das Ozon-Loch - kingsolomon, 20.08.2004, 18:19
- Ja mit der Furzsteuer... - SchlauFuchs, 20.08.2004, 19:47
- Re: Nur nicht so eilig - Diogenes, 20.08.2004, 20:43
- na ja, ich weiss nicht, wie Euklid auf eine Furzsteuer gegen das Ozon-Loch - kingsolomon, 20.08.2004, 18:19
- Hehe. Genau diese Reaktion haben die sich erhofft. - Burning_Heart, 20.08.2004, 16:23
- Auf nach Neuseeland!!! - alberich, 20.08.2004, 16:05
Tax revenues in New Zealand
-->Maurice P. McTigue, former member of the New Zealand parliament. It was taken from a piece that appeared in the publication, Imprimis (which is a publication of Hillsdale College). New Zealand has made amazing changes in its government, and one of the best is described below:
When we in New Zealand looked at our revenue gathering process, we found the system extremely complicated in a way that distorted business as well as private decisions. So we asked ourselves some questions: Was our tax system concerned with collecting revenue? Was it concerned with collecting revenue and also delivering social services? Or was it concerned with collecting revenue, delivering social services and changing behavior, all three? We decided that the social services and behavioral components didn’t have any place in a rational system of taxation. So we resolved that we would have only two mechanisms for gathering revenue - a tax on income and a tax on consumption - and that we would simplify those mechanisms and lower the rates as much as we possibly could.
We lowered the high income tax rate from 66 to 33 percent, and set that flat rate for high-income earners. In addition, we brought the low end down from 38 to 19 percent, which became the flat rate for low-income earners. We then set a consumption tax rate of 10 percent and eliminated all other taxes - capital gains taxes, property taxes, etc. We carefully designed this system to produce exactly the same revenue as we were getting before and presented it to the public as a zero sum game. But what actually happened was that we received 20 percent more revenue than before. Why? We hadn’t allowed for the increase in voluntary compliance. If tax rates are low, taxpayers won’t employ high priced lawyers and accountants to find loopholes. Indeed, every country that I’ve looked at in the world that has dramatically simplified and lowered its tax rates has ended up with more revenue, not less.

gesamter Thread: