Warum USA den Genozid im Sudan als Genozid bezeichen: Ã-LRESERVEN

verfasst von kingsolomon, 14.09.2004, 11:52

-->


" If an oil export embargo is approved, China and India would lose their influence over Sudan's vast oil reserves and a Khartoum regime change would open up these resources to the West. The US is in favour of sanctions, China is against."

und

"Critics however hold that it was the Western thirst for Sudanese oil that in fact started the fighting in Darfur by training the SLA and JEM (anti-Khartoum) rebels. Chaos in Sudan, German analyst Uwe Friesecke told afrol News, will give Western powers an opportunity to intervene militarily and provoke a change of the unpopular Islamist regime in Khartoum. With new powers thus handed to the World Bank and the IMF to open up Sudan's economy, the country's vast oil reserves would be accessible to Western oil companies, the analyst holds"
<ul> ~ UN Darfur vote turns scramble for Sudan's oil</ul>

Thread gesperrt

 

gesamter Thread:

• Warum USA den Genozid im Sudan als Genozid bezeichen: Ã-LRESERVEN - kingsolomon, 14.09.2004, 11:52