C-h-i-n-a? für wen, warum und weshalb gar nicht prima!

verfasst von Emerald, 12.01.2005, 03:41

-->Economic -- Sunday's New York Times includes a chapter from a book to be released next month. The title of the book is"China, Inc., How the Rise of the Next Superpower Challenges America and the World," by Ted. C. Fishman. The title of the NYT article is"Manufaketure." The subtitle runs,"Counterfeiting and pirating (that is, making knockoffs of what developed nations have created) are at the heart of the Chinese economic boom. As unethical and illegal as it might be, the Chinese government is not about to stop it. China's failure to police industry and to protect intellectual property acts, in effect, like one of the greatest industrial subsidies in the world."

Here's the last paragraph of the long article and this paragraph probably says it all."It's a dangerous bargain (for American business people), becoming a partner to a system that's a relentless competitor at the same time. The Chinese government recently announced that it would suspend the purchase of large aircraft in 2005, claiming it wants to cool off an overheating domestic aviation industry. It's just as likely that China wants to give its aircraft industry a chance to catch up with foreign manufacturers like Boeing. If so, the American industrial giant which has pinned much of its future growth on sales in China and has aggressively transferred technology to China in order to secure its place there, may well lose billions in sales -- and end up with a competitor that can match its current technology and beat it on cost. Last month, China announced the first international sale of 20 domestically produced midsize passenger planes."

So that's the story. US companies that believe they can"take over" a Chinese industry find that their items are soon copied, and then manufactured by Chinese companies for the benefit of the Chinese. It is unfair, it is piracy. In China it is simply considered commerce and"the way of the world, at least the Chinese world."

Thread gesperrt

 

gesamter Thread:

• C-h-i-n-a? für wen, warum und weshalb gar nicht prima! - Emerald, 12.01.2005, 03:41
  • Re: C-h-i-n-a? für wen, warum und weshalb gar nicht prima! - Karl52, 12.01.2005, 04:05
  • Heftig! - Plutarch, 12.01.2005, 04:12
  • - Manufaketure Volltext Link ohne Registrierung - - Wassermann, 12.01.2005, 04:23
    • Einige Auszüge daraus - Plutarch, 12.01.2005, 05:11
      • Ergänzung - Plutarch, 12.01.2005, 05:19
  • Re: deshalb war auch das ne typische"Holzmann" Aktion von Schröder - kingsolomon, 12.01.2005, 11:05
    • Re: deshalb war auch das ne typische"Holzmann" Aktion von Schröder - Plutarch, 12.01.2005, 12:49
  • Das ist ein ganz natürlicher Prozess und nicht zu stoppen. - Heller, 12.01.2005, 11:51