- Müssen die Bullionbanken bis Ende Mai eindecken? -neues von GATA - R.Deutsch, 15.05.2001, 11:03- Bis Freitag auf 275$. Na ja, wär ja nicht schlecht. Schaun'mer mal! Danke!! - marsch, 15.05.2001, 11:23- Und die Aktienmärkte erst mal runter! (owT) - Optimus, 15.05.2001, 11:31
 
 
- Bis Freitag auf 275$. Na ja, wär ja nicht schlecht. Schaun'mer mal! Danke!! - marsch, 15.05.2001, 11:23
Müssen die Bullionbanken bis Ende Mai eindecken? -neues von GATA
MIDAS COMMENTARY FOR MAY 14, 2001
By Bill Murphy
www.LeMetropoleCafe.com
May 14, 2001
Gold $268.30 up 30 cents 
Silver $4.34 up 1 cent
Here's a bombshell from Bob Chapman that fits in perfectly 
with the information you have been getting from Midas for 
the past four weeks or so. Bob, who is a big GATA supporter 
and editor of the International Forecaster, sent us the 
following even before he published it in his own newsletter:
 Our intelligence sources have informed us that 
 Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan has given the 
 bullion banks until the end of May to clear up 
 their hedging and outstanding gold derivative 
 positions. Evidentially this process has been 
 going on for some time. Further, British Prime
 Minister Tony Blair will try to make available, 
 at the upcoming British gold auction, additional 
 gold that will go to banks designated by 
 Greenspan. We were also told that AngloGold 
 will sell forward a designated amount of gold to 
 banks also specified by Greenspan. Our source 
 for this intelligence has been very accurate in 
 the past. They also said they thought that gold 
 would break out over $275 an ounce by Friday.
Subscription information for Bob's newsletter: one year 
$79.95 U.S. Funds. Make check payable to Robert Chapman, 
Box 510518, Punta Gorda, Florida 33951 USA. Please include 
name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address. Bob 
accepts Visa and MasterCard charges. Please provide your 
card number and expiration date. Bob publishes twice a 
month by surface mail and three or four times a month by 
e-mail. His email address is BIF@gate.net.
I can't see how the bullion banks can cover without being 
bailed out. The weekly supply/demand deficit is too big. 
The only way for them to cover without the price going 
bonkers is for someone else to take on their shorts. 
This ought to be interesting. If Bob's intelligence is on 
the money again and the Gold Cartel has run out of protection, 
look out.
old was very quiet today ahead of the British Auction tomorrow 
and the Fed's decision on cutting interest rates, also to be 
announced tomorrow.
Of interest:
-- The gold price action remains very constructive and is 
different than it has been the past four years.
-- Spot bullion remains above its 200-day moving average 
and has formed a small bullish flag formation.
-- The gold open interest on Comex has dropped to only 
105,491 contracts. This is very bullish as it is 
extraordinarily low from a historical perspective. That 
means the trade does not want to be short, possibly 
because they do not have the physical gold to hedge.
-- The gold stocks popped late today and remained firm. It 
is my guess that gold is getting ready to rock again to the 
upside.
I thought you might like to see some of the feedback I am 
receiving on the GATA African Gold Summit that was held 
in Durban. I think it will help you understand what a big 
success this was for all of us.
>From Dick Trostler:
 The following information was passed along to 
 me by Christine Maggiore, author of the book 
"What if everything you thought you knew about 
 AIDS was wrong?" This information is in two parts. 
 The first is a message from Anita Allen, who is 
 apparently in South Africa. The second part is a 
 letter to Business Day, the South African 
 newspaper, by David Rasnick, Ph.D., who is a 
 member of South African President Mbeki's AIDS 
 Advisory Panel. I had to read Anita Allen's portion 
 several times in trying to understand what she is 
 saying. She writes in a sort of shorthand. But I 
 think that you will find it of value. 
 From:"Anita Allen" 
 Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 16:58:36 +0200
 Subject: Golden Good News South Africa flash 
 9 May 2001
 Dear All:
 Thought you might be interested to know that 
 the Boston US Anti-Trust Men are in town just 
 a stone's throw away. Guess what they are 
 doing here? Telling Big Business the game's 
 up. Expect soon the rise of bullion to somewhere 
 between $600-$1000. South Africa finally has 
 control of the gold price. This coincides with US 
 off the Human Rights Committee, Bush jetting in 
 for a private hey, Thabo, I hear HIV doesn't cause 
 AIDS....
 The Boston Boys were all over Tim Modise's Show 
 this morning. And you should have heard the callers! 
 They even asked the Boston Star on his show to 
 repeat everything he had just finished saying, and say 
 it again from the front (so they could record it -- no 
 doubt, and study what exactly the hell he is saying).
 Callers in between already knew all about it and 
 asked for phone numbers to contribute to the costs. 
 This is the greatest show on earth in my lifetime so far. 
 I am so happy its virtually in my back yard, so to 
 speak...
>From South Africa's Andy Brown:
 
 My son-in-law, a promising apprentice gold bug, 
 yesterday attended a Johannesburg family 21st 
 birthday, where there were about 50 friends and 
 relatives of all ages and he did a small survey. 
 He asked about 15 attendees if they knew about
 the cold conference in Durban on the May 10. 
 Without exception, all said yes. Wow! GATA's 
 efforts in Durban are an unqualified success, 
 although many sections of the mainstream 
 written press seem to be worried more about 
 their jobs rather than printing the truth. However, 
 South African Broadcasting Co. television have 
 given GATA incredible exposure. What a contrast! 
 As a member I would sincerely thank all those in 
 GATA for their tireless efforts over the past two 
 years. 
>From Steve Munnings, responding to Business Day's article
today by Ilja Graulich,"GATA's conspiracy theory." 
 Dear Sirs:
 I consider myself a rational, intelligent, and 
 somewhat sceptical person. For the record, I am 
 not 100 percent convinced by GATA's claims, but 
 am listening with an open mind, and have yet to see 
 any credible counter-evidence that which refutes 
 GATA's. Opinions galore, on both sides, but evidence 
 is what counts!
 Ilja seems to be presenting a mostly anti-GATA 
 opinion. His credibility (in my mind) suffers 
 immensely when he states the following:"The 
 group dismisses what is taught about supply and 
 demand in Economics 101 that if demand drops and 
 supply rises, which it has done due to central 
 bank selling, the price of a commodity should 
 drop." This is demonstrably untrue. They are not 
 only well aware of the supply/demand theory of 
 economics, but it forms a central part of their 
 arguments. 
 To wit: They maintain that an unusual and unexpected 
 source of supply -- the unprecedented level of gold 
 selling and leasing by the central banks -- is not 
 only unusual but is larger than is generally held, 
 and is (at least partly) as a result of a"gold 
 price suppression" conspiracy. 
 
 They maintain that gold derivatives (especially"short 
 selling" and"shorting" in all forms) amounts to 
 ADDITIONAL supply side pressure. And maybe 
 Economics 101 does not cover that, but Economics 
 201 surely supports that thesis!
 Also hurting his case is the following:"But to prey on 
 the innocence of some and keep hope alive may hurt
 their cause in the end."
 Surely"preying on the innocent" is the activity of 
 fraudsters, not that of people who believe in their 
 cause -- even if they were eventually to be proved 
 wrong. Is Ilja accusing the GATA group of 
 deliberately misleading people? Their actions are 
 highly consistent with those of people who believe 
 in the truth of their cause, not deliberate con artists.
 Ilja states that the question"Why, if this evidence is 
 so compelling, have so few joined GATA's crusade?" 
 needs answering. Does it? Does Ilja not know that 
 most people do not actively join a cause until it has
 become popular or politically correct? How many 
 people does he expect to join such a cause even if 
 they are convinced that it has the truth? Is a 
 measure of a crusade's worth and credibility the 
 number of joiners? What happened to the truth?
 By this implied standard Jesus' crusade" was not 
 worthy until years after his death! 
 
 The truth (or lack thereof) of the allegations made 
 by GATA stand (or fall) on their own merits, not on 
 how many people have joined! Whether they are 
 effective as a political force, on the other hand, 
 could very well be measured by how many people
 join the cause. Two very different issues.
 Here is a counter-question:One of the things GATA 
 is urging the conference attendees to do is to ask 
 some very pointed questions to some very specific 
 individuals. Would it not be best to suspend 
 judgment on the merits of their case until those
 questions have been answered? And, if it is within 
 one's power to do so, press for the answers?
And finally, a response to the findings reported to the 
World Gold Council by Professor Anthony Neuberger of the 
London Business School, as reported in the Financial 
Times last week.
 I am a 1996 graduate of London Business School 
 and had Professor Anthony Neuberger for a class 
 in options and futures. He seemed like a nice guy, 
 but my impression was that he's a very 
 mathematical, risk-immunization type of finance 
 guy with no feel for the realities of the markets. 
 By the way, you might be interested to know that 
 one of the head professors of economics at LBS 
 is Lord David Currie. From what I understand, he 
 once was (and maybe still is) one of the so-called 
"seven wise men" of the Bank of England. He's 
 probably well-connected these days; I've heard that
 he's a Labourite and has been an adviser to Blair 
 and the Labour government in general.
 I quickly looked at the LBS website but couldn't 
 find him listed. My year 2000 Alumni Handbook 
 has him listed as the deputy director of external 
 relations. Anyway, my information is pretty dated, 
 but that's something that you might want to look 
 into. There may be a connection between the 
 BOE and the LBS study.
I would have loved to be a fly on the wall last week 
for this one:
 BASEL, Switzerland (Reuters) -- U.S. Federal 
 Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan and 
 European Central Bank President Wim 
 Duisenberg will both take part in a meeting of 
 central bankers on Monday at the Bank for 
 International Settlements in Switzerland. 
 Greenspan and Duisenberg attended a dinner 
 on Sunday along with Bank of England Governor 
 Sir Edward George and other members of the 
 Group of 10 central bankers. As he left the 
 dinner, Greenspan was asked by reporters 
 whether he was there to urge the European
 Central Bank to cut interest rates. He replied 
 only:"I am here because I am a member of this 
 group." Duisenberg, who left the dinner a few 
 minutes after Greenspan, declined to say what 
 had been discussed during the evening. The 
 chairmen of the central banks of the Group of 
 10 countries meet periodically at the Bank for 
 International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, 
 to discuss the world economic situation.
I can see Alan Greenspan now at the BIS:"Gentlemen, we 
have a slight problem. It involves a letter sent to me by 
Senator Joe Lieberman..."
-END-	
	
<center>
<HR>
</center>
 Thread gesperrt
Thread gesperrtgesamter Thread:
 Board-Ansicht
Board-Ansicht Mix-Ansicht
Mix-Ansicht

