- THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET - BossCube, 09.08.2001, 23:27- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - JüKü, 09.08.2001, 23:42- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - dottore, 10.08.2001, 00:06- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - YIHI, 10.08.2001, 11:39- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - André, 10.08.2001, 12:20
 
 
- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - YIHI, 10.08.2001, 11:39
 
- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - dottore, 10.08.2001, 00:06
 
- Re: THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET / Genüsslich lesen! - JüKü, 09.08.2001, 23:42
THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET
THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET
 THE DAILY RECKONING
 PARIS, FRANCE
 THURSDAY, 9 AUGUST 2001
 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 *** Investors - and consumers - throwing in the towel?
 *** Havoc in the markets - and"beige" is such an
 innocuous color...there's that nasty little phrase
 again:"conflict of interest"...
 *** Home equity"mining" still in vogue - could it be
 all that's left...aoutiens and the route de la
"Velorution"... readers react...wealth in the 20th
 century...and more!
 ***"Investors could be throwing in the towel," an
 investment analyst told Bloomberg."The market decline
 has been such a long, drawn out process, I think they're
 giving up." Investors reportedly"yanked" $14.7 billion
 from stock funds in July.
 *** Our hero, the almighty American consumer, may be
 capitulating too. According to the Fed, consumer
 borrowing dropped $1.6 billion in June - the first
 decline since 1997, and the largest since 1992...the
 last time the"r" word was on everybody's lips.
 *** And there's that messy little phrase
 again..."Merrill Lynch - while refusing to admit any
 wrongdoing - has agreed to pay $400,000 to settle a
 claim by Debasis Kanjilal, a New York pediatrician,"
 writes Prudent Bear's Marshall Auerback.
 *** Kenjilal lost $500,000 betting on Infospace - a
 Henry Blodgett recommendation. The doctor and his wife
 sued Blodgett and the firm for $10.5 million.
( Ah, so machen die das!)
 While they bought Infospace at close to its peak price of $133,
 they had to sell it for $11...the suit claims Blodgett's
 recommendation constituted a"conflict of interest".
 *** Mary Meeker, Queen of the Internet, may have also
 been conflicted. Meeker has been named in a suit by
 several investors who lost money on Amazon and eBay.
 They accuse Meeker of making positive recommendations
 based on"her desire to attract and retain investment
 banking clients for Morgan Stanley."
 *** Revulsion...retrenchment, recrimination...is this
 all just"negative drivel"? Perhaps. More in a"guest
 essay" below. First, let's check in with Eric.
 *****
 Eric Fry reporting from the scene of the crime:
 - Beige...it's such a nice, neutral color. It seems like
 the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans of color - one that could
 not possibly offend and certainly not one that could
 cause any harm. But now we know better.
 - From the moment the Federal Reserve released its
"beige book" yesterday, investors gaped in horror and
 fled for their financial lives. By the time the
 pandemonium had subsided, the Dow had dropped 165 points
 to 10,293. The Nasdaq spiraled down about 3%...falling
 61 points to 1966.
 - Few stocks escaped unscathed, with all Dow components
 except Coca-Cola finishing lower on the day.
 - Bonds celebrated the grim economic news by rallying
 sharply - the 10-year Treasury note yield falling down
 to 5.05% from 5.17% on Tuesday.
 - The so-called beige book is an anecdotal survey of the
 economy produced by the Fed. The latest edition,
 released Wednesday, featured an economy down on its
 luck. Specifically, the country's months-long
 manufacturing slump is now reverberating throughout the
 entire economy.
 -"Manufacturing activity declined further in recent
 weeks," the survey concludes,"as producers responded to
 ongoing weakness in demand and worked to balance
 inventories. Reports of reduced work hours, lost
 overtime, forced furloughs, plant shutdowns, and layoffs
 were pervasive."
 - Low-lights included:"Conditions in real estate
 markets softened";"Many districts noted that airline
 bookings, hotel occupancies, and hotel room rates fell
 in recent months";"Retail sales generally remained weak
 in June and July"...
 - The beige book"does not paint a pretty picture,"
 First Albany Corp.'s chief investment officer Hugh
 Johnson told smartmoney.com."The illusion of a second-
 half economic recovery is now transmuting into the
 prayer for a recovery in the first half of 2002,"
 cautions my friend Michael Lewitt of Harch Capital
 Management."Don't bet your last dollar on a recovery
 anytime in 2001 or early 2002 - or it may become your
 last dollar."
 - As a hedge fund manager specializing in junk bonds,
 Lewitt enjoys a front row seat from which to view
 economic booms and busts. He observes,"U.S. companies
 defaulted on $53.8 billion of corporate debt in the
 first six months of 2001 and may break last year's
 record of $131.8 billion."
 - Yet despite the"repayment optional" mentality that
 many borrowers exhibit, banks continue to lend willy-
 nilly to corporate and consumer borrowers alike.
 - Meanwhile, home-equity"mining" has become, for some,
 a kind of career."There are people [in hot areas] who
 live on refis of appreciated housing," observes James
 Grant citing the Mortgage Bankers Assoc."Mortgage
 originations this year will reach [a record] $1.54
 trillion...fully half of this year's refi transactions
 have put money in the borrower's pocket."
(Man überlege sich nur, was passiert, wenn kein Geld aus der Hypotheken-Um-Aufschuldung mehr in den Konsum fließt....)
 - In 1945, Americans owed mortgage creditors just 14% of
 the value of their homes - the rest, 86%, was theirs in
 equity. In 1985, they owed 32%. As of the first quarter,
 they owed 45%, leaving 55% in equity. During the
 fabulously prosperous 1990s, homeowners ran down their
 equity by almost 10 percentage points.
 - Tell me again what"savings" the boomers are counting
 on to fund their retirement years?
 *****
 To Addison, back in Paris...
 *** You may remember, back in March, that our own Thom
 Hickling was on the scene as a coalition of Socialists
 and Green party activists won the mayoral election in
 Paris. While partying in the streets in front of Hotel
 de Ville with the victors, Thom snapped a photo of some
 celebrants holding a sign reading:"Deviation".
 In case you didn't see it the first time:
 http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_photo_true.cfm?id=990
 *** At the time, we were puzzled by the sign's meaning.
 Not anymore. Soon after the election, the Green Party's
 Alain Lipietz named a three-mile stretch of road along
 the right bank of the Seine the"route de la Velorution"
 - a compound of the word for bicycle and revolution. He
 banned cars from it, through Aug. 15. The rest of the
 story made international news.
 ***"For the aoutiens, as Parisians who stay in town are
 known," says UPI,"the sweet days of empty streets have
 vanished. Vehicles that usually use the George Pompidou
 way, as the segment of road is properly named, are being
 obliged to use and clog up the streets." Now even the
 socialists have joined in condemning the pollution and
 traffic problems caused by the Greening of Paris.
 The Daily Reckoning Presents: A Guest Essay... a
 rebuttal of sorts.
 THE SECOND COMING OF THE BULL MARKET
 by Addison Wiggin
"You plant a rose, you get a rose...you do not get a
 potato."
 Her accent was thick, but since the discussion had
 veered headlong into the subject of religion, we had
 abandoned my French altogether.
 La Fete de la Vierge - a religious celebration in honor
 of the Virgin Mary - is next Wednesday. My French
 colleagues will be taking the day off from work.
"Well, I don't know anything about it," I said.
"What denomination are you?"
"I'm a deist..."
"What's a deist?"
"Um..."
"Is that like being a Buddhist? I'm a Buddhist. Sort of.
 I'm Catholic by birth..."
"A deist is a kind of agnostic, but respectful."
"Do you feel responsible?"
"For many things...but I don't expect much personal
 attention, er, from above."
"Me either. You plant a rose. You get a rose."
 Yesterday Porter suggested that while we'll"undoubtedly
 have continuing economic cycles - booms and busts - I'm
 more convinced than ever before that Bill's view of the
 20th Century as a period of ruin for humanity is totally
 wrong. And, more importantly, I'm convinced that the
 coming years will be better for us than we could
 possibly imagine. Better financially. Better physically.
 And vastly richer."
 Much of Porter's optimism can be found in a report
 published by the Cato Institute titled:"The Greatest
 Century That Ever Was".
 The report shows the progress we've enjoyed in the 20th
 Century - largely due to advances in technology."Life
 expectancy has increased by 30 years," reads the
 report's executive summary,"infant mortality rates have
 fallen 10-fold; the number of cases of (and death rate
 from) major diseases - such as tuberculosis, polio,
 typhoid fever, whooping cough, and pneumonia - has
 fallen to fewer than 50 per 100,000; air quality has
 improved by 30 percent in major cities since 1977;
 agricultural productivity has risen 5 to 10-fold; real
 per-capita gross domestic product has risen from $4,800
 to $31,500; and real wages have nearly quadrupled from
 $3.45 an hour to $12.50."
 The list of improvements in human life in the last 100
 years is truly remarkable. In fact, if you haven't
 already, I suggest you give this report a once-over:
 The Greatest Century That Ever Was
 href="http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-364es.html"
"The central message of the study," writes Cato's
 Stephen Moore,"is that the fruits of a free society are
 prosperity, wealth, and better health. All of the
 evidence [suggests] that in every material way, life in
 the United States, with a population of 270 million, is
 much better today than it was in 1900, when the
 population was 75 million.
"Moreover, the American people are net resource
 creators, not resource depleters...We have produced more
 than we have consumed, leaving savings and wealth to our
 children and grandchildren."
"Capitalists and entrepreneurs continue to make the
 world a better place" writes Mr. Stansberry."And for
 this, they make a profit and their investors earn a
 return."
 As an example he provides us with a company worth
 looking into - Antigenics."The company has trended
 higher this year, despite the bear market," says Porter,
"moving from $11 to over $17 today because its success
 isn't tied to our economy, but instead to the
 technological prowess of its scientists."
 I was intrigued, so I took a look. Antigenics is
 currently trading at $16, has a market cap of $438
 million...but no reportable earnings. (Hahaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!))))
 Porter himself mentioned they have not had a saleable product since
 1994. So, I wondered, how do you know if it's a good
 investment?
"If I taught a class," said Warren Buffett,"on my final
 exam, I would take an Internet company and ask 'How much
 is this company worth?' Anyone who would answer, I would
 flunk."
 To my mind, you would have to dunk Antigenics into the
 same litmus solution. The only way you could hope to
 even get your money back from this stock would be if
 somebody else wanted to own it exuberantly enough to pay
 you more for it than you paid. Which might even have
 worked last year.
"What a refreshing piece by Porter Stansberry," wrote a
 DR reader on the website discussion board."...amid the
 continuous negative drivel that one usually reads here.
 The sky is not falling. Once the bull market resumes,
 what will you do?"
"You could become professional mourners," he suggests
"and appear at funerals with your doleful faces."
 That might be a little too ambitious for us.
 In fact, today I've set my sights a little lower. While
 we're all grateful for the advances of the 20th Century -
 personally I'm a big fan of the Internet - I'll resist
 the temptation to explain them all and suggest only that
 the Second Coming of The Bull Market is a little farther
 off than one might expect...leaving the"little guy" in
 a bit of a precarious situation if he's expecting to
 flip stocks for a profit.
 Jeremy Grantham points out that in 1929, the markets
 settled into a 17-year bear market, succeeded by a 20-
 year bull market...followed in 1965 by a 17-year bear
 market, then an 18-year bull."Now are we going to have
 a 1-year bear market?" asks Grantham."It doesn't sound
 very symmetrical."
 All the usual suspects - Fed rate cuts, the so-called
 productivity 'miracle' - have been rounded up and are
 standing quietly in the line waiting for their mug shots
 to be taken.
"Given that the Fed has now reduced interest rates six
 times this year," wrote Richard Russell on Tuesday,"the
 stock market should be surging higher. Since 1971 there
 have been 13 Fed rate-cutting cycles (not counting the
 current one). In 10 out of the 13 cycles, the S&P was
 higher six months after the first Fed cut, and this was
 true of the Nasdaq as well. From 1971 through 1999 the
 average gain for the S&P six months after the first Fed
 cuts was 12.4% and the average gain for the Nasdaq was
 16.2%."
 Instead, the S&P at 1183 is 10.4% below its level at the
 close of 2000, just 3 days before the first rate cut.
 The Nasdaq is down 20.4% for the year this year...and
 the average mutual fund down 8.65%. With the news that
 $1.6 billion dollars was"yanked" out of investment
 funds in July, you might expect them to decline further.
"Reckonings don't last. Redemptions follow," Porter
 asserts. No doubt, this is true. But how long do you
 want to wait? Can you afford to wait at all?
"Broken promises, unfulfilled expectations," writes Mark
 Rostenko, editor of the Sovereign Strategist."Rate cuts
 don't work, earnings ain't getting better, the Fed is
 still full of crap and propoganda, why [would anyone]
 buy?"
 "In 1929 the S&P 500 peaked at 21 times earnings,"
 points out Mr. Grantham."In 1965 it peaked at 21 times.
 Not so long ago it peaked at 33, and is now somewhere
 around 26...
"[Does anyone] really think," he continues,"we're on
 the edge of the next bull market when the p/e of the S&P
 is still higher than its pre-'29 crash?"
"Folks are catching on that it might not be so simple
 this time around," says Rostenko. In a bear market, with
 investor recrimination on the rise, one might be a
 little more skeptical about companies with no
 earnings...and no products. But that's up to you...
 You plant a rose. You get a rose.
 Until then,
 Addison Wiggin,
 The Daily Reckoning
<center>
<HR>
</center>
 Thread gesperrt
Thread gesperrtgesamter Thread:
 Board-Ansicht
Board-Ansicht Mix-Ansicht
Mix-Ansicht

