>Danke Manfred, jetzt kann ich mich ein wenig besser orientieren...
>übrigens, wer ist den Astrologisch gesehen Dein Favorit bei der Bundestagswahl?

Kevin,
keine Ahnung, damit beschäftige ich mich nicht, wenn dann würde ich so vorgehen wie in meinem ARtikel unten beschrieben
Gruß,
Manfred
--------

Horary astrology
This form of astrology is much older than natal astrology (see references (1)). The basic assumption of horary astrology is that the time something happens or a question is asked allows conclusions about the future of the matter. After having interpreted several hundred questions and events I am still fascinated by the simplicity and accuracy of horary astrology. The biggest drawbacks are the limited time horizon (3-6 months) and that not all questions can be answered. From my point of view, horary astrology is better suited for wordly affairs while the strength of natal astrology is the psychological and spiritual side of life.
In recruiting the concept implies that the time of the first contact between the applicant and the company contains valuable insights, as well as the time of the job interview or other important events in the recruiting process. Moreover, in the last stage of the recruiting process you can ask a question of this type,"Shall I hire applicant A or appliant B?". You can do horary work without knowing anyone’s birthdate, or you can combine it with natal astrology. So the big advantage is to avoid the birth time problem.
A important concept in horary astrology is the void of course moon which I am going to test in my doctoral thesis (see last chapter). The moon needs 27.3 days to revolve once around the earth (360°), so it stays about 2-2 ½ days in each of the 12 zodiac signs (30°). On its journey the moon is forming certain angles (aspects) to the other planets, for the traditional defintion of the void-of-course moon we use the aspects 0°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 180°. They are only valid when the moon and the planet are in the same sign. After the last exact aspect in a sign the moon is void of course until it enters the next sign. I estimate that the moon is void of course about 20% of the time but this varies much from month to month and from year to year. In the appendix you find a table with the void-times from September 2001 to March 2002.
The void-of-course moon indicates a cosmic out-time and is best used to exlore the inner resp. the other world through mediation, prayer, dreaming, psychotherapy, or sleeping. This is the time for the soul to fly, not to stay on earth. Endevours in the outer world are seldom fruitful, in most cases nothing will come out of it. This time is usually not conducive for business activities (some exceptions do exist): decisions are unrealistic, judgment is more fallible, agreements and contracts don’t turn out as intended. When you buy something for the first time, you probably won’t buy it again.
I want to demonstrate the value of horary astrology on the example of the US presidential elections. During the year 2000, natal astrologers in literally hundreds of articles and boards discussed the question who would be elected next president, Bush or Gore. It is safe to say that the natal astrologers were not able to arrive at the consensus despite having applied dozens of techniques, both known and unknown, simple and sophisticated, and from Eastern and Western astrology. The astrologers‘ predictions were split roughly 50:50 mirroring pretty much the later election result.
It was much easier with horary astrology. You simply had to look at the times when the two candidates were nominated. In every presidential election from 1900 through 1972 one of the two major party candidates was nominated with the moon void of course, and these were always the losing candidates. Al Gore was nominated on August 16, 2000 under this cosmic signature, and so he suffered defeat.
Now to part two of the the presidential-story. Since 1945 only four US-presidents were inaugurated under this constellation:
Franklin Roosevelt (January 20, 1945): died a few months later
John F. Kennedy (January 20, 1961): assassinated in November 1963
Richard Nixon (January 20, 1973): resigned in disgrace in 1974
Bill Clinton (January 20,1997): was close to resign early, could barely stay in office
Note for astrologers: during the inauguration of Clinton the moon was only"semi-void" because there still was a quincunx with Jupiter and the chart was boosted by four planets in conjunction with the MC. This seemed to have saved Clinton.
So how can you apply this knowledge to recruiting and business life? Do not sign employment or other important contracts, do not plan decisive meetings, and do not meet far-reaching decisions during these times. If possible, take an out-time or do routine work. I have to add that, of course, it is not as simple as outlined here. Certain factors in your personal horoscope may strengthen or weaken the effects. When you have a strong moon/ Cancer-influence (e.g., I have both sun and ascendant in Cancer, that’s why I am fasinated by the concept) you will react stronger to the moon. Other factors can almost eliminate the effects. It is best to discuss this with your astrologer (if you are not an astrologer yourself).
Besides, the simple equation"void of course = bad for business" is not valid. In 1974, Michael Munkasey (see references (2)) empirically demonstrated that high-flying stocks tend to start trading with a void of course moon. The most prominent example is Microsoft which is listed on the Nasdaq since March 13, 1986. In this article it is also shown that when the markets open with this special astrological signature they tend to rise significantly more often than expected by chance. Why? For the same reason the first two dozen successful spaceshots are going back to this time - because stocks and rockets can easier leave the ground under this constellation!
<ul> ~ http://www.amanita.at/x/01-recruiting.htm</ul>
<center>

<HR>

</center>