-->Hier mal ein Auszug (nur ein Auszug, lieber Elli!)
aus Ted Butlers neuem Kommentar.

BARRICKS BLACK EYE

Another development I’d like to mention is the quarterly earnings report by Barrick Gold. As expected, Barrick acknowledged another large gold short derivatives loss. Though this loss was buried deep in the body of the report, the combined first quarter realized and open loss grew to over $5.5 billion. No other entity has ever reported a loss so large.

http://www.barrick.com/Theme/Barrick/files/docs_quarter/2006_Q1_rev2.pdf

The surprise in the Barrick report was the aggressive covering, or buy back, of the gold short position. Fully 25% of the year-end 20 million ounce gold short position was bought back in the quarter, with more since the quarter end. While the first 4.7 million ounces covered in the first quarter cost Barrick $814 million, or a loss of $173 per ounce, the last million ounces bought back after quarter end cost Barrick $386 million, or an astounding $386 per ounce. Aside from selling short at the absolute low in the gold price for the past few years and then buying back at the absolute high, there is no other way to lose that much money per ounce.

The other surprise in the Barrick report was that, even though they booked a big loss in covering some gold shorts, they still reported a profit. This is the financial equivalent of alchemy turning lead into gold. If I had a financial interest in Barrick, I would complain to the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Since I don’t have a financial interest, I can only marvel at the creativity of the accountants and lawyers that Barrick employs that can magically turn losses into profits. I just wish I could get them to prepare my tax returns.

One thing I haven’t seen mentioned in the gold community has been the effect Barrick’s buy back has had on the price of gold. That gold has rallied sharply as Barrick has been buying gold is no coincidence. The almost 6 million ounces that Barrick has purchased recently is more than $3.5 billion worth of gold. It’s more than half of what the big gold ETF (GLD) holds. Remember, GLD took a year and a half to buy its gold; Barrick took a couple of months. If anyone has a better reason why gold has rallied sharply, I’d love to hear it.

<ul> ~ http://www.investmentrarities.com/weeklycommentary05-08-06.html</ul>

-->No, it doesn't matter what anyone thinks, but it's quite obvious that the Bank of England dumped an awfull lot of bullion on the market yesterday..perhaps most of what they had left, in an effort to bail out the LME. It takes a lot of gold to drop the price $35 in forty five minutes.

The far more significant question remains as to just how Britain obtained $179.5 billion in US treasuries. They certainly didn't get it through exports as did Japan or China, that much is for sure. The only other answer is that it is renting out it's military for our adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, likely involving another hidden off-budget expenditure. That is real big considering what we are getting out of the deal.


PS:
Have a look at U.K.

-->>gleich um $ 10.00 zum Tages-Höchst von heute, was mich einigermassen irritiert.
>

hi emerald,

da kennst du doch, oder nich???????
Manchmal, da meint man, "die" wollen doch nur dich aergern, und du meinst, die sind alle nur hinter dir her.
Lass' dich nicht auch noch anstecken.

tschuess
G.C.[img][/img]

p.s. verkaufst du jetzt die Minen und Gold wieder, gibt es natuerlich, wie programmiert, das nächste Schlachtfest.
Tust du es nicht, dann...(s.o.)