-->Audio clip of Mr. Bush:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/bushadmitsbombs.mp3
COMMENT FROM WHAT REALLY HAPPENED:
"There you have it. President Bush had admitted what the eyewitnesses reported on 9/11; that there were bombs inside the World Trade Towers.
"Of course, Bush pins the blame for the bombs on Al Qaeda, which is sort of accurate when you consider that most of Al Qaeda is a creation of U.S. and Israeli intelligence.
"But in trying to explain away the eyewitness reports of bombs, Bush has dug himself into a deeper logic hole. How did these"Al Qaeda" bombers manage to spend at least a week (according to witnesses who heard and saw them) working inside the buildings under the noses of Bush's cousin and brother, who were in charge of security for the World Trade Center? Security at the towers was tight following the 1993 attempted bombing. You could not simply walk into an elevator unless you could document employment or a meeting. Yet as one can tell from the tell-tale marks left by the cutter charges, these preparations took a great deal of time and materials to carry out.
"Why did these"Al Qaeda" bombers go to the extra effort to drop all three buildings straight down instead of toppling them sideways, maximizing the damage?
"If Al Qaeda succeeded in bombing the buildings, why bother with the airplanes? Why bother hiding the bombing itself, if it was truly the work of terrorists out to make a statement?
"In admitting the bombs, Bush has opened up the inquiry to include the very great amount of incriminating evidence found near the airplanes linking the attacks to Arab nations, versus the total absence of any such evidence near the bombs. This contrast is ONLY explained if the evidence left with the airplanes was planted, to frame someone.
"Why did it take 5 years for the government to admit what was obvious to everyone right from the start; that explosives were used to bring down the buildings, unless the original plan was not to admit to the bombs in the first place?
"Dubya, in his pathetic attempt to pin the blame for the now-admitted bombs on Al Qaeda, has created far more logical problems then he has solved."
The truth has a nasty habit of slipping our when least expected. No wonder more and more Americans now realize that the official 9/11 story is bogus

--><hr noshade size="1" color="#0000FF">

Hallo alberich,

leider entsprechen die in Deinem <font color="#CC0066">Wikipedia-Link</font> zu findenden Angaben bezüglich der Etage 98 (und möglicherweise auch darüber - AON) nicht den Tatsachen bis hin zu den Tagen kurz vor dem 11.September 2001. In dem Film „911 Mysteries“, den auch Du Dich offensichtlich weigerst anzusehen, wird ein Gesprächsmitschnitt mit dem Augenzeugen Scott Forbes präsentiert, der folgendes beschreibt:

It must have been at least 4 to 6 weeks before 9/11. It was like rebuilding work going on upstairs. The tenants - the people from AON who had been there were moved somewhere else. The offices were just vacant… and there was a lot of heavy machinery building work going on. It was almost like pneumatic drills and lots of hammering. So much that the floors were shaking - that’s how noticeable it was. It was almost as if something heavy was being moved and then it was being taken off wheels and it was like - BOOM! Our floor underneath literally shook - you could feel the weigh above you. That was how large it was.

On one occasion I opened a door to see what was going on, being nosey… When I opened the door the whole office space was empty. There was nothing there at all. It was quite bizarre because it was just empty. Completely empty. Barren. Nothing. Zero. Not even cables hanging from the ceiling… But there’d been these heavy noises and vibrations up above. It was really strange.

Weiterhin berichtet er von hartnäckig und wiederholt auftretendem Staub im Bereich der Fenster und Fahrstühle in der Woche vor dem Anschlag.

Außerdem hat er in einem - wie ich finde sehr informativen und sachlichen Interview - detaillierte Angaben zu der am Wochenende vor dem Anschlag durchgeführten totalen Stromabschaltung in der oberen Hälfte des Südturmes und... - sehr interessant - zum Entstehen seines Misstrauens und den „Reaktionen“ der amerikanischen Untersuchungsbehörden auf seine Versuche, diese Beobachtungen zu melden, gemacht...

Das obendrein Interessante an Forbes ist die Tatsache, das er als im WTC direkt Angestellter Brite seine amerikanischen Kollegen bezüglich Ihrer mangelnden Kritikfähigkeit gegenüber Ihrer Regierung so einschätzt:

I feel that the US media and Americans in general have an over-sanitized and safe character. They are far less willing to be critical of their government and country than foreign media and individuals and this extends to the point of not questioning accepted half-truths. Also, 9/11 is now part of an American History that is cherished and almost Holy - to question it is to be traitorous.

Das vollständige Interview zur Stromabschaltung im WTC gibt es im Link.

Wie ich schon schrieb...

Ich bleibe neugierig!

Viele Grüße
SteffenM



<ul> ~ Interview mit Scott Forbes</ul>