>The"Advantages" Of A RESERVE Currency > If you are NOT an American, but a resident of ANY other nation in the world, please ask yourself this question. What do you think would have happened > to the exchange value of your currency if the NET external debt of your nation had risen by 44% last year? Now, here`s another question to ask yourself. > What do you think would have happened to the exchange value of your currency if your Central Bank had cut its controlling interest rates almost in HALF > so far this year, the year AFTER your nation`s NET external debt increased by that 44%? > We`ll make it simple. Do you think your nation would still HAVE a currency? > Well, maybe it would, but we think that you will agree when we say that your currency would be in very sad shape indeed. Since you are NOT an > American, your currency is NOT the world`s RESERVE currency, and is thus subject to all the trials and tribulations of rational valuation. > But the U.S. Dollar IS the world`s RESERVE currency. And because it still holds that position, it is not - YET - subject to any type of rational valuation at all. > As a prelude to what follows, let us state that in 1985, for the first time since before World War I, the United States became a NET external debtor. That > means that foreigners held more U.S. assets than Americans held foreign assets. 1985 was sixteen years ago. > The U.S. Commerce Department has just (on June 28) announced a series of what should be extremely sobering facts. Last year, the NET external debt > of the United States increased by 44.1%. Don`t forget, the U.S. has been building its NET external debt position for SIXTEEN years, and this increase took > place over ONE year. > Here are the figures from the Commerce Department (T = Trillion) > 1999: US holdings abroad: $7.21T -- Foreign holdings in US: $8.73T -- NET US debt: $1.52T > 2000: US holdings abroad: $7.19T -- Foreign holdings in US: $9.38T -- NET US debt: $2.19T > In 2000 alone, the NET U.S. external debt increased from $1.52 Trillion to $2.19 Trillion, a rise of $670 Billion. A rise of $670 Billion from a base - in 1999 - of > $1,520 Billion is an increase of 44.08% - IN ONE YEAR! > This trajectory of indebtedness is totally and absolutely UNSUSTAINABLE! It took 15 years (1985-1999) for the U.S. to increase its net external debt from > $0 to $1.52 Trillion. That`s an average increase of just over $100 Billion per year. In 2000, the increase was $670 Billion - almost SEVEN TIMES the > average for the previous fifteen years. > As you know, the U.S. has been adding to its net indebtedness this year. But the picture becomes even more astonishing when one considers what the > Fed has been doing since January. It is pathetically obvious that the U.S. is now borrowing ALL of whatever"growth" it can eke out of its economy. > Usually, investors like to get some kind of a"return" on their investments. But this year, the Fed has cut short-term U.S. rates almost in half, U.S. stock > markets are all in the red, and corporate and Treasury debt paper is a wasteland. > The foreign debt of the U.S. is exploding, U.S. interest rates are imploding, U.S. markets are hanging by a thread. And what is the Dollar doing? IT IS > RISING! On June 28, the U.S. Dollar index hit a 15-year high of 120.29. Economic history provides very few spectacles to equal this one. > Now, if you ARE an American, here`s a question for you. How long do you think that the Dollar can maintain its present lofty position in the face of what > you have just read? Have you made any provision to protect yourself in the case that it can`t hang in mid air much longer? > As we have stated many times, both in these pages and in the pages of The Privateer, the ability of the U.S. economy to defy both financial prudence and > economic rationality is based on the fact that the U.S. Dollar is the world`s SOLE reserve currency. Until the end of 1998, there was no other contender > for this title. Now, with the advent of the Euro at the beginning of 1999, a currency specifically designed to create a"United States - Of Europe", there is. > How has the U.S. reacted to the birth of the Euro? In March 1999, through NATO, it instigated a (Balkans) WAR on European soil - the Euro fell. In the year > between June 1999 and May 2000, the Fed INCREASED U.S. rates - the Euro fell. In late 2000, a U.S. Presidential election hung in the balance for over a > month. The Euro stopped falling and recovered. In 2001, the Fed has been slashing U.S. rates while hurling increasingly strident demands at Europe that it > inflate its currency to take some of the"strain" off the U.S. - the Euro fell again. > Now, according to the Wall Street Journal, a U.S. Treasury official has DEMANDED that Europe slash its rates and Japan begin to literally print money to
>"aid" in the efforts being made by the U.S. to"re-start global economic `growth`". Why is the U.S. demanding this? Because the U.S. economy is TOTALLY > dependent on foreign investment to"grow". If the Europeans and the Japanese don`t inflate, there won`t be enough foreign capital available to lend to the > U.S. so that it can"grow". The stakes in THIS game are now extreme > The essence of the whole situation is that the U.S. is playing a gigantic game of financial"chicken" with the rest of the world in general, and with Europe > and Japan in particular. In essence, they are saying this:"We are too big to fail, and if we fail, we`ll take you all down with us". > Gold`s place in all this is what Gold`s place in all this has ALWAYS been. It is the alternative to a global"money" which is given"value" by fiat and which > is given"acceptance" by the raw power of its purveyor - the United States. As long as physical Gold literally exists, it will act as the ultimate"brake" on > the profligacy of debt-based financial systems. > What we face is simply a matter of facing facts, and of exercising patience. The present financial trajectory which the U.S. is on is absolutely > UNSUSTAINABLE. It cannot last. Unless and/or until the Euro becomes a currency which is officially REDEEMABLE in Gold, there will be no other > protection against a U.S. Dollar swan dive except Gold (and Silver). Right now, Gold forms 15% of the official reserves behind the Euro, but the Euro is > NOT redeemable in Gold. The U.S. has long since declared Gold as financial public enemy NUMBER ONE. There is no official connection between the U.S. > Dollar and Gold at all. > The U.S. is now in a position in which it has to hold Gold down"forever", or see its position as the purveyor of the world`s sole reserve currency come to > an end. This will prove an impossible task, all that remains to be seen is how much MORE damage is done in the process.
> > von www.the-privateer.com
<center>
<HR>
</center> |